zwierz
- 334
- 62
there are a lot of different interesting motions in this problem
The problem involves a pendulum system formed by a light wire rod bent into a hoop, with a ball attached at one end. The setup includes a revolving shaft and requires finding the equilibrium angle between the rod and the vertical, considering the coefficient of friction between the shaft and the hoop.
The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the forces and torques involved. Some have suggested drawing diagrams to clarify the relationships between the forces, while others are attempting to derive equations relating the forces to angles. There is a focus on understanding how to achieve equilibrium without producing conflicting torque equations.
Participants note the importance of the line of action of the gravitational force and its relation to the point of contact. There are also discussions about the assumptions made regarding the positions of the mass and the hoop in relation to the shaft.
This quote, and the associated figure indicate that there is support for a bending moment transfer between the pendulum shaft and the ring. Saying this differently, the pendulum is not pivoted on the ring, but is rather fixed on the ring. This means that there is only one DOF, not two.Ceva said:An end of a light wire rod is bent into a hoop of radius r.
That is strange. This problem is too simple to discuss it in a monograph in detail.Dr.D said:IIRC, J.P. Den Hartog discussed this problem in detail in his Mechanical Vibrations text from many years ago.
zwierz said:That is strange. This problem is too simple to discuss it in a monograph in detail.
So what are the several possible cases?Dr.D said:He did not discuss it in detail, but only offered it as a homework problem in such a way that the person working the problem would develop a rather comprehensive discussion of the several possible cases.
Are you referring to the original problem in post #1 or to the very different problem zwierz introduced (in violation of forum guidelines!) in post #29?RoloJosh16 said:I understand the fact that on an incline the slipping begins at a angle ## \alpha ## s.t tan ## \alpha =
\mu ## , but how can you assocciate that fact to this problem?
haruspex said:Are you referring to the original problem in post #1 or to the very different problem zwierz introduced (in violation of forum guidelines!) in post #29?
haruspex said:Are you referring to the original problem in post #1 or to the very different problem zwierz introduced (in violation of forum guidelines!) in post #29?
In the original problem the shaft is turning at constant speed and the system is in steady state, so we are only concerned with kinetic friction.RoloJosh16 said:To the original problem.
The original problem is similar to having a conveyer belt inclined at angle ##\alpha## with the belt moving upward at a constant speed. Suppose a box is placed on the moving belt and the box happens to stay at rest relative to the earth. Then you can ask for the relation between ##\alpha## and the coefficient of kinetic friction ##\mu_k##.RoloJosh16 said:I understand the fact that on an incline the slipping begins at a angle ## \alpha ## s.t tan ## \alpha =
\mu ## , but how can you assocciate that fact to this problem?
TSny said:The original problem is similar to having a conveyer belt inclined at angle ##\alpha## with the belt moving upward at a constant speed. Suppose a box is placed on the moving belt and the box happens to stay at rest relative to the earth. Then you can ask for the relation between ##\alpha## and the coefficient of kinetic friction ##\mu_k##.
Yes, that's right.RoloJosh16 said:Ahhh, thank you. I was thinking about that relation but didn' t think about a moving surface. The box in that case would be the tiny part of the hoop in contact with the shaft?