Olympiad Mechanics problem (torque)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a pendulum system formed by a light wire rod bent into a hoop, with a ball attached at one end. The setup includes a revolving shaft and requires finding the equilibrium angle between the rod and the vertical, considering the coefficient of friction between the shaft and the hoop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of torque and the conditions for equilibrium, questioning the use of the friction coefficient in the context of the problem. There are considerations about the direction of forces and torques, as well as the positioning of the point of contact.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the forces and torques involved. Some have suggested drawing diagrams to clarify the relationships between the forces, while others are attempting to derive equations relating the forces to angles. There is a focus on understanding how to achieve equilibrium without producing conflicting torque equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the line of action of the gravitational force and its relation to the point of contact. There are also discussions about the assumptions made regarding the positions of the mass and the hoop in relation to the shaft.

  • #31
there are a lot of different interesting motions in this problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
IIRC, J.P. Den Hartog discussed this problem in detail in his Mechanical Vibrations text from many years ago.
 
  • #33
Ceva said:
An end of a light wire rod is bent into a hoop of radius r.
This quote, and the associated figure indicate that there is support for a bending moment transfer between the pendulum shaft and the ring. Saying this differently, the pendulum is not pivoted on the ring, but is rather fixed on the ring. This means that there is only one DOF, not two.
 
  • #34
Dr.D said:
IIRC, J.P. Den Hartog discussed this problem in detail in his Mechanical Vibrations text from many years ago.
That is strange. This problem is too simple to discuss it in a monograph in detail.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
zwierz said:
That is strange. This problem is too simple to discuss it in a monograph in detail.

By George! You are correct. He did not discuss it in detail, but only offered it as a homework problem in such a way that the person working the problem would develop a rather comprehensive discussion of the several possible cases. I was recalling my own detailed write up of this problem.
 
  • #36
Dr.D said:
He did not discuss it in detail, but only offered it as a homework problem in such a way that the person working the problem would develop a rather comprehensive discussion of the several possible cases.
So what are the several possible cases?
 
  • #37
Several different friction models.
 
  • #38
It does not make sense to consider friction models whenever non slipping condition has already been imposed.

The phase portraits of described above system essentially differ from each other for the following four cases ##\epsilon r/g>1,\quad \epsilon r/g=1,\quad 0<\epsilon r/g<1,\quad \epsilon=0##

The center of the ring can rotate about the shaft; it can oscillate near its stable equilibrium; it can even perform asymptotic motions
 
Last edited:
  • #39
I'll leave you to discuss it with Den Hartog.
 
  • #40
I understand the fact that on an incline the slipping begins at a angle ## \alpha ## s.t tan ## \alpha =
\mu ## , but how can you assocciate that fact to this problem?
 
  • #41
RoloJosh16 said:
I understand the fact that on an incline the slipping begins at a angle ## \alpha ## s.t tan ## \alpha =
\mu ## , but how can you assocciate that fact to this problem?
Are you referring to the original problem in post #1 or to the very different problem zwierz introduced (in violation of forum guidelines!) in post #29?
 
  • #42
haruspex said:
Are you referring to the original problem in post #1 or to the very different problem zwierz introduced (in violation of forum guidelines!) in post #29?

To the original problem.
 
  • #43
haruspex said:
Are you referring to the original problem in post #1 or to the very different problem zwierz introduced (in violation of forum guidelines!) in post #29?

Do you understand what I am asking?
 
  • #44
RoloJosh16 said:
To the original problem.
In the original problem the shaft is turning at constant speed and the system is in steady state, so we are only concerned with kinetic friction.

Edit: but, interestingly, if we define α as tan(α)=μk then the answer can be written as (R+L)sin(θ)=Rsin(α ).
 
Last edited:
  • #45
RoloJosh16 said:
I understand the fact that on an incline the slipping begins at a angle ## \alpha ## s.t tan ## \alpha =
\mu ## , but how can you assocciate that fact to this problem?
The original problem is similar to having a conveyer belt inclined at angle ##\alpha## with the belt moving upward at a constant speed. Suppose a box is placed on the moving belt and the box happens to stay at rest relative to the earth. Then you can ask for the relation between ##\alpha## and the coefficient of kinetic friction ##\mu_k##.
 
  • #46
TSny said:
The original problem is similar to having a conveyer belt inclined at angle ##\alpha## with the belt moving upward at a constant speed. Suppose a box is placed on the moving belt and the box happens to stay at rest relative to the earth. Then you can ask for the relation between ##\alpha## and the coefficient of kinetic friction ##\mu_k##.

Ahhh, thank you. I was thinking about that relation but didn' t think about a moving surface. The box in that case would be the tiny part of the hoop in contact with the shaft?
 
  • #47
RoloJosh16 said:
Ahhh, thank you. I was thinking about that relation but didn' t think about a moving surface. The box in that case would be the tiny part of the hoop in contact with the shaft?
Yes, that's right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K