On the definition of Von Neumann entropy

univector
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am confused by the definition of the Von Neumann entropy. In Nielson and Chung's book page 510, the Von Neumann entropy is defined as
S (\rho) = - tr(\rho \log \rho)
where \rho is the density matrix. What is the definition of the logrithm of a matrix? Is it some series expansion of a matrix, or an element-by-element logrithm?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that

\frac{d}{dx}\log(1+x)=\frac{1}{1+x}=1-x+x^2-x^3+\cdots

Integrate.

\log(1+x)=x-\frac{x^2}{2}+\frac{x^3}{3}-\frac{x^4}{4}+\cdots

Now set y=1+x.

\log y=(y-1)-\frac{(y-1)^2}{2}+\cdots=\sum_{k=1}^\infty(-1)^{k+1}\frac{(y-1)^k}{k}

This suggests that if A is a matrix, we can define log A by

\log A=\sum_{k=1}^\infty(-1)^{k+1}\frac{(A-I)^k}{k}

for all matrices A such that the series converges. More information here.
 
Last edited:
Hi Fredrik,

Thanks for the explanation. If the matrix \rho is not diagonal, it is not trivial to calculate the matrix polynomial series. Instead, if we do a similary transform to diagonize \rho first, things may become easier. Let the diagonal matrix be D. Then by using the series expansion forward (for a matrix) and backward (for a number), we can come up with
S(\rho) = tr (D M),
where
M = \left( \begin{array}{cccc} \log \lambda_1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; ... \\<br /> 0 &amp; \log \lambda_2 &amp; 0 &amp; ... \\<br /> ... &amp; ... &amp; ... &amp; ... \\<br /> 0 &amp; ... &amp; 0 &amp; \log \lambda_n<br /> \end{array} \right)
where \lambda_i is the ith engenvalue of matrix \rho (or D), and n is the number of rows (also columns) of \rho .

Is this the way people calculate S(\rho)?
 
Yes.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top