On the radius of convergence of a power series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the radius of convergence for power series, particularly in the context of complex analysis. The original poster expresses curiosity about the necessity of a radius of convergence and questions whether a power series could converge differently in various directions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the uniformity of convergence in different directions for power series. Some participants reference established theorems and tests related to convergence, such as the Cauchy-Hadamard theorem and the ratio test, while others appreciate the question's significance in complex analysis.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various perspectives on the radius of convergence, with some participants providing references to theorems and tests that address the original poster's questions. There is no explicit consensus, but the dialogue appears to be productive in exploring the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that textbooks often do not address the original poster's specific question regarding convergence in different directions, indicating a potential gap in available resources on the topic.

piggees
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new here. I am curious that why a power series must have a radius of convergence? I mean, even in a complex plane, there is always a so-called convergent radius for a power series. Is it possible that a power series is convergent for a certain range in one direction, and for an apparent shorter/longer range in some other direction? So far all the textbooks I read do not give lessons over this question. Any answer or hint or instruction will be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is no, it can't have a larger range of convergence in a different direction. The relevant theorem is the Cauchy-Hadamard theorem. Lots of links on the internet, one of which is:

http://eom.springer.de/c/c020870.htm
 
This is a really great question, though. Its answer is part of the beauty of complex analysis.
 
It is, basically, an application of the "ratio test".

If [itex]f(z)= \sum a_n(z- z_0)^n[/itex]] then the series converges, absolutely, as long as
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{|a_{n+1}(z- z_0)^{n+1}|}{|a_n (z- z_0)^n|}[/tex][tex]= |z- z_0|\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}{a_n}|< 1[/tex]
and diverges if that limit is larger than 1.

As long as
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}= A[/tex]
exists, then we have that the power series converges for
[tex]|z- z_0|< \frac{1}{A}[/tex]
and diverges for
[tex]|z- z_0|> \frac{1}{A}[/tex]

You can get the same result by using the root test instead of the ratio test:
[itex]\sum a_n (z- z_0)^n[/itex] converges absolutely as long as
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(a_n(z- z_0)^n)^{1/n}= \left(\lim_{n\to\infty}\sqrt[n]{a_n}\right)|z- z_0|[/tex]
is less than 1.
 
thank you all for the replies. That does help.
 
OK, I think I get it. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K