On torque and work having same units

  • Thread starter benabean
  • Start date
31
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

In rotational motion ,

the units for torque, [itex] \tau = r \times F [/itex],

are N [itex]\cdot[/itex] m


and for work done by a torque,

[itex]W = \int_{\theta1}^{\theta2} \tau \cdot d\theta [/itex], are Joules.

Yet both these quantities are homongenous/ have same SI units.

Is it so wrong to quote torques in Joules? If so, why?
(And vice versa)

b.
 

Answers and Replies

Shooting Star
Homework Helper
1,975
4
Torque and work are two different types of quantities. Work done done is a scalar quantity, whereas torque is a (pseudo)vector.

As a matter of interest, you are not even supposed to say mN for torque, but Nm.

For more, read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque" [Broken].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Redbelly98
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
12,038
128
N-m or N*m would be even better.
 
they have the same dimensions, but so do the frequency of a sound wave and the rate constant of a first order chemical reaction. Does that mean you can express a rate constant in Hz??
 
rbj
2,221
7
you can use the same units if you want, but it might confuse some folks if you used Joules to describe a measure of torque.

turning a shaft against X Nt-m of torque exactly one radian of twist requires X Joules of energy. measuring angles in radians is dimensionless (being the ratio of like-dimensioned quantities: arc length divided by radius).
 
31
0
Thanks guys, you're help is very appreciated.
 

Related Threads for: On torque and work having same units

Replies
11
Views
23K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
899
Top