On torque and work having same units

  • Thread starter benabean
  • Start date
  • #1
31
0
In rotational motion ,

the units for torque, [itex] \tau = r \times F [/itex],

are N [itex]\cdot[/itex] m


and for work done by a torque,

[itex]W = \int_{\theta1}^{\theta2} \tau \cdot d\theta [/itex], are Joules.

Yet both these quantities are homongenous/ have same SI units.

Is it so wrong to quote torques in Joules? If so, why?
(And vice versa)

b.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Shooting Star
Homework Helper
1,977
4
Torque and work are two different types of quantities. Work done done is a scalar quantity, whereas torque is a (pseudo)vector.

As a matter of interest, you are not even supposed to say mN for torque, but Nm.

For more, read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque" [Broken].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Redbelly98
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,117
154
N-m or N*m would be even better.
 
  • #4
they have the same dimensions, but so do the frequency of a sound wave and the rate constant of a first order chemical reaction. Does that mean you can express a rate constant in Hz??
 
  • #5
rbj
2,226
9
you can use the same units if you want, but it might confuse some folks if you used Joules to describe a measure of torque.

turning a shaft against X Nt-m of torque exactly one radian of twist requires X Joules of energy. measuring angles in radians is dimensionless (being the ratio of like-dimensioned quantities: arc length divided by radius).
 
  • #6
31
0
Thanks guys, you're help is very appreciated.
 

Related Threads on On torque and work having same units

Top