One Dimensional Collision dealing with Reference Frames

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of a reference frame (S') where the total momentum of a collision between two clay balls is zero. A 20g ball moving at 12 m/s collides with a 40g ball at rest, prompting the need to find the observer's frame speed that balances their momenta. The initial calculations suggest a velocity of -6 m/s for the 40g ball to achieve zero momentum, but confusion arises regarding the necessity of making their velocities equal and opposite. Clarification emphasizes that the observer's speed should account for both mass and velocity to properly analyze the collision. Ultimately, understanding the mass's role in momentum calculations is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
JimiJams
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 20g ball of clay is shot to the right at 12m/s toward a 40g ball of clay at rest. The two balls of clay collide and stick together. Call this reference frame S.


Homework Equations



What is the velocity of a reference frame S' in which the total momentum is zero?

The Attempt at a Solution



How I interpreted this is I calculated what velocity the 40 g ball would need to move for total momentum to equal zero. I came up with (.02kg)(12m/s)+(.04kg)(-6m/s)=0

Having found its velocity to be -6 m/s to satisfy a total momentum of zero I figured a reference frame moving 3 m/s would make the 20 g ball appear like it was traveling at 9 m/s and the 40 g ball at -9 m/s.

But this still doesn't sit right with me. I don't know why I went through the trouble of making their velocities appear equal but opposite, it seems unnecessary.

So my other though is maybe they mean the total momentum of the reference frame should be zero in which case the reference frame would simply have a velocity of 0 m/s.

Do either of these sound right? The wording of the question seems to complicate things.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi JimiJams! :smile:
JimiJams said:
How I interpreted this is I calculated what velocity the 40 g ball would need to move for total momentum to equal zero. I came up with (.02kg)(12m/s)+(.04kg)(-6m/s)=0

Having found its velocity to be -6 m/s to satisfy a total momentum of zero I figured a reference frame moving 3 m/s would make the 20 g ball appear like it was traveling at 9 m/s and the 40 g ball at -9 m/s.

hmm …

let's start again:

describe in english what the collision would look like in in frame S'
 
In my opinion, what the question is asking you is:

To the reference frame that is watching the two balls collide, what must be its speed such that the total momentum of the collision is 0.

So the speeds of the two balls of clay need to be subtracted by some speed (which would be the speed of S') so that their new speed is in the reference frame of the observer.

My equation looks something like (m1)(12-x)+(m2)(0-x)=0, where x is the speed of the observer.

By solving this you'll get a number which will satisfy the equation when you plug in the new speeds of the to objects relative to the observer.
 
Tiny Tim, that's the best I can do. It's word for word from the book so...

EricV, you completely cleared it up for me. I was heading in that direction except I was strictly thinking of velocity and not taking into account mass. So I kept trying to figure a way to make each ball appear like it was moving 0 m/s. obviously 12 m/s right only works for the 20g ball and 0 m/s only works for the 40g ball. MASS! DUH! Thanks a lot!
 
JimiJams said:
Tiny Tim, that's the best I can do. It's word for word from the book so...

Yes, I know, but the book describes it in one frame, and it often helps to describe it in the other frame …

what would the collision look like in in frame S' ? :wink:
 
JimiJams,

You're welcome. However, be sure to follow tiny-tim's advice as well next time. The very first thing I did when I read the problem was I visualized it from the perspective of the S' observer, and after that the answer came quickly.

Eric
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top