One more question on Tesla coils :)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fog37
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coils Tesla
AI Thread Summary
Tesla coils operate as resonant transformers, enabling wireless energy transfer, unlike ordinary transformers which function effectively across a range of frequencies. While both devices utilize inductance, transformers do not inherently rely on resonance, which is defined by a specific angular frequency determined by inductance and capacitance. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding Maxwell's equations and established RF propagation theory over Tesla's more speculative ideas. Tesla's contributions to AC power distribution are acknowledged, but his theories lack the rigorous mathematical backing seen in mainstream electrical engineering. Overall, the focus remains on the practical applications and proven principles of electrical theory.
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Dear Forum,
I have recently tried to understand how a Tesla coil works.
A Tesla coil seems very similar to a regular transformer. Based on my understanding, a transformer is fundamentally composed of two inductors (with possibly a different number of windings) interlinked by an iron core. A transformer has many uses. Once of them is to step up or step down an input AC voltage (vice versa for the AC current).

Tesla coils, which can wirelessly turn on nearly fluorescent lights, are said to be resonant transformers.
In what sense are ordinary transformers not resonant? The word "resonant" brings to mind an LC or RLC circuit which has a resonant angular frequency ##\omega_0= 1/ \sqrt{LC}##. So a transformer surely has an inductance L in virtue of the fact that it is composed of two inductors.
I guess regular transformers, which seem to work any any frequency ##f##, actually work better at a certain frequency, the resonant frequency?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
anorlunda said:
I think this article answers most of your questions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_coil
I would avoid getting too taken up with all the Tesla culture. The basics of Maxwells Equations, Antenna and RF Propagation theory are very well proven and have been successfully used for more than a hundred years. Tesla's ideas are far from the mainstream theories. This appeals to some people but it should be born in mind that Tesla was a lot better at hand waving ideas and flowery language than providing mathematical proof or repeatable measurements. Personally, I prefer to stick with something that actually works every day and all over the World, rather than going for the Magic of the Tesla scene.
PS He did, of course, successfully champion AC electrical power distribution. So he was not all bad. :smile:
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top