One-parameter family of metrics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mach4
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of a one-parameter family of metrics on the manifold M=S^4, specifically exploring the formulation G(u) = (1-u)*g + u*h, where g and h are metrics on the manifold and u is a parameter in the interval [0,1]. Participants examine the compatibility conditions and the implications of combining metrics with different curvature properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes defining a one-parameter family of metrics G(u) on the manifold M and inquires about the compatibility conditions.
  • Another participant suggests that the proposed formulation works for Euclidean metrics due to the properties of symmetric positive definite matrices, but raises concerns regarding Minkowskian metrics where the sum may not be valid.
  • A participant confirms that both metrics g and h are symmetric positive definite but non-Euclidean, and expresses concern about the implications of different curvature tensors when defining G.
  • It is noted that curvature is not linear in the metric, indicating that the curvatures of g and h do not simply add to form the curvature of G.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the linearity of Riemannian curvature and confirms that adding two positive definite metrics does not lead to inconsistencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the properties of symmetric positive definite metrics and the validity of the proposed formulation for certain cases, but there is disagreement regarding the behavior of curvature and the implications for Minkowskian metrics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the curvature when combining different metrics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the linearity of curvature in relation to the metrics and the implications of combining metrics with different curvature properties. There are also limitations regarding the applicability of the proposed formulation to Minkowskian metrics.

mach4
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have a manifold M=S^4 which is endowed with a physical metric g.
I can define another metric on this manifold h (a pullback metric).

Does it make sense to define a one-parameter family of metrics G(u) on the manifold M in the form

G(u) = (1-u)*g + u*h , where u is a parameter in [0,1] ?

Are there any compatibility conditions?
Any help would be appreciated - Thx!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're talking about euclidean metrics, then that should work, since the sum of two symmetric positive definite matrices is symmetric and positive definite, and so qualifies as a metric. It won't work for minkoswkian metrics though, since, eg, diag(1,1,1,-1) and diag(1,1,-1,1) are both valid metrics, but their sum is not.
 
Thanks for your help!
Both metrics are symmetric positive definite but non-Euclidean.

When I check G for
-symmetry
-bilinearity
-non-degeneracy
all criteria of a metric seemed to be satisfied.
I was just bothered by the fact that g and h are associated with different curvature tensors, but it seems that they simply add to define the new curvature tensor of G.

Did I understand correctly? In the case of the Minkowskian-metrics the 'non-degeneracy' is not satisfied and thus it does not define a metric.
 
The curvature is not linear in the metric, so will not simply add. But it's true, you can get a continuous family of metrics with different curvatures (obviously the curvature will then vary continuously over this family). And yes, the problem is that the sum of Minkowski metrics is not necessarily non-degenerate.

By the way, by "Euclidean" I mean a positive definite metric, not a flat one. It's just to distinguish from "Minkowskian".
 
uups - you are right. The Riemannian is clearly not linear in the metric. Bad mistake :(.
Thus, the operation of adding two positive definite metric is possible and does not lead to any inconsistencies. Great!
Thanks again for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K