Only quasistatic process can be a polytropic process

AI Thread Summary
A process is considered adiabatic if it occurs rapidly enough to prevent heat exchange, while a quasi-static process is defined by its slow progression, allowing the system to remain near thermodynamic equilibrium. The relationship PV^gamma = c can hold for fast adiabatic processes, such as sound waves, where local thermodynamic equilibrium is maintained, despite the global equilibrium being disrupted. Quasi-static processes are typically polytropic because they involve gradual changes that keep thermodynamic variables well-defined. However, if a process occurs too quickly, it risks losing its quasi-static nature, leading to complex behaviors like shock waves. Thus, while fast processes can sometimes be treated as quasi-static under specific conditions, the distinction between adiabatic and quasi-static remains critical in thermodynamics.
atavistic
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
We may say a process is adiabatic if it occurs fast enough such that no heat is exchanged from the system.But we also say a process is quasi-static when it occurs very slow.

Then how can PV^gamma = c hold for a fast occurring adiabatic process because a polytropic process should be quasistatic as wiki says http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polytropic_process .

Also why is it true that only quasistatic process can be a polytropic process.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
atavistic said:
But we also say a process is quasi-static when it occurs very slow.

Says who? A process that occurs slowly may be quasistatic but that doesn't necessarily make it so. A quasistatic process is a process that occurs near thermodynamic equilibrium. How the term "near" is described in the last sentence is open to interpretation.

A quasistatic system is also a system that occurs over several of these near equilibrium states so that eventually the final state is different from the initial state, which can be considered of occurring slowly depending on the amount of the states you want to create for a given process.
 
It is implicitely assumed that throughout the process the thermodynamic variables like tempersture and pressure are well defined, so it has to be a quasi-static process. If you let a gas expand faster and faster, then what will start to happen is that during the expansion process the gas cannot be described by a single set of thermodynamical variables. You'll get a shock wave that propagtes through the gas, so you need to describe the gas using a position dependent temperature, pressure, density, and flow velocity.

But this description is also just an approximation. If the expansion process is sufficiently violent, local thermodynamic equilibrium will also break down. In that case the velocity distribution of the molecules at any given point in the gas during the expansion process is can no longer be approximated by the Maxwell distribution.

Such a gas can only be described by a propabaility distribution over velocity and configuration space. The time evolution is given by the Boltzmann equation.
 
So basically can I say even when a process occurs fast, it can be quasistatic if its state can be defined using gas laws. For e.g. the speed of sound has been derived using an adiabatic process , the reason being that the time difference is so small such that no heat is exchanged and then the relation PV^gamma is used. So it means that the state of the air is defined during compression and rarefaction even though these events occur very fast.
 
atavistic said:
So basically can I say even when a process occurs fast, it can be quasistatic if its state can be defined using gas laws. For e.g. the speed of sound has been derived using an adiabatic process , the reason being that the time difference is so small such that no heat is exchanged and then the relation PV^gamma is used. So it means that the state of the air is defined during compression and rarefaction even though these events occur very fast.

Yes, but note that the speed of the process which makes the process adiabatic also threatens to make the process not quasistatic. In the case of a soundwave you mention, you have local thermodynamical equilibrium, i.e. at every point in the gas you have a well defined pressure, density and temperature, which evolves adiabatically to a good approximation. But obviously, global thermodynamical equilibrium has broken down: The entire gas cannot be described by a single pressure and temperature. If it could, there wouldn't be a sound wave.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top