Op Amp Circuit - Simple non-inverting circuit question

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dwn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amp Circuit Op amp
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the analysis of a non-inverting operational amplifier (op-amp) circuit. The user presents an equation derived from Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) involving resistances of 236kΩ and 1kΩ, questioning the absence of the variable R1 in their calculations. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying KCL, which requires expressing currents as voltages divided by resistances. The conclusion drawn is that the equation setup needs reevaluation to ensure all variables are accounted for.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of operational amplifier configurations, specifically non-inverting circuits.
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and its application in circuit analysis.
  • Basic knowledge of resistive components and their impact on circuit behavior.
  • Proficiency in solving equations involving sinusoidal functions and their coefficients.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of operational amplifier feedback and stability.
  • Study Kirchhoff's laws in depth, focusing on practical circuit applications.
  • Learn about the impact of resistor values on gain in non-inverting op-amp circuits.
  • Explore techniques for analyzing sinusoidal signals in electrical circuits.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and hobbyists working with op-amp circuits who seek to deepen their understanding of circuit analysis and operational amplifier configurations.

dwn
Messages
165
Reaction score
2
Op Amp Circuit -- Simple non-inverting circuit question

Homework Statement



Image2. The attempt at a solution

0V*(236k/R1) + (-0.1cos(500t)*(236k/1k)) = 23.7cos(500t)

Is this the correct setup of the equation because there is no R1 variable to solve for...?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-03-30 at 10.19.59 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2014-03-30 at 10.19.59 PM.jpg
    9.7 KB · Views: 543
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dwn said:

Homework Statement



Image


2. The attempt at a solution

0V*(236k/R1) + (-0.1cos(500t)*(236k/1k)) = 23.7cos(500t)

Is this the correct setup of the equation because there is no R1 variable to solve for...?

I am not understanding your equations. KCL equations are in the form of currents leaving a node, so voltages divided by resistances...
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K