Open source for FE / Fluid Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
Open source options for finite element (FE) and fluid analysis are being sought for simulating icing and melting processes in ice storage systems. Autodesk CFD is suggested as a viable tool, especially since it is free for students and personal use. Additionally, resources like the FEniCS project are mentioned for open source finite element method (FEM) tools. The user plans to utilize CREO's student version for geometry modeling. These tools can aid in analyzing the effects of different shapes and coolant energy requirements in the simulation.
WIN
Messages
48
Reaction score
10
Hi! I'm would like to ask if there's any open source available for FE/Fluid analysis?

I'm planning to use it to simulate icing and melting process in a ice storage based on different geometry.Its something like a fridge with coolant ect. I would like to simulate the icing and melting process with the consideration on the different shape(where the icing occur) and in consideration of its coolant and energy needed. For the geometry/shape i would be able to use CREO student version to work with.
 
The best thing I can think of would be Autodesk CFD, which is free for students/personal use.

about:
http://www.autodesk.com/products/cfd/features/all/gallery-view

download: (need account)
http://www.autodesk.com/education/free-software/all
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top