Operating a spring in both tension and compression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of using a spring that can operate in both tension and compression for a design project involving a test bed for an actuator. While physics problems often treat springs as capable of both functions, practical implementation reveals a distinction between compression and tension springs, particularly in their end finishes. Leaf springs are considered for their ability to transmit both forces, but there is uncertainty about their suitability for extension. Suggestions include using coaxial springs or a conventional helical spring with U-bolt clamps for mounting, emphasizing the need for a reliable setup that can handle forces up to 250 kN without requiring frequent changes. The conversation highlights the importance of finding a spring design that can effectively manage the intended mechanical forces in the test bed.
moatra
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Most of my physics homework problems have had no problem treating a spring as being able to operate in both compression and tension. However, I now need to find a way to actually implement that for a design project. The general idea is a test bed creating opposing force to test a new actuator. I'd like to put a spring in between the two force creation mechanisms to transfer both compressive and tensile forces, as well as allowing for some slippage in their operation.

Looking at most spring manufacturer's catalogs show a distinct separation between compression and tension springs. Some initial research shows that it wouldn't be advisable to try and weld a standard coil spring due to their high carbon content. I'm currently looking at leaf springs as a possible method since the way they're attached to a car easily allows for transmission of both compressive and tensile forces, but I can't find anywhere if they're actually meant to operate under both conditions. Are they? If not, what spring setup is actually able to operate in both compression and tension?

tl;dr: How to actually use a spring in both compression and tension?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
moatra said:
Most of my physics homework problems have had no problem treating a spring as being able to operate in both compression and tension. However, I now need to find a way to actually implement that for a design project. The general idea is a test bed creating opposing force to test a new actuator. I'd like to put a spring in between the two force creation mechanisms to transfer both compressive and tensile forces, as well as allowing for some slippage in their operation.

Looking at most spring manufacturer's catalogs show a distinct separation between compression and tension springs. Some initial research shows that it wouldn't be advisable to try and weld a standard coil spring due to their high carbon content. I'm currently looking at leaf springs as a possible method since the way they're attached to a car easily allows for transmission of both compressive and tensile forces, but I can't find anywhere if they're actually meant to operate under both conditions. Are they? If not, what spring setup is actually able to operate in both compression and tension?

tl;dr: How to actually use a spring in both compression and tension?

Welcome to the PF. I'm an EE, not an ME, so I'm of limited help. I do have to ask the obvous question, though, can you just use two coaxial springs for your setup? A tension spring inside a compression spring, with appropriate mechanical connections made to both at each end?

I think tension springs would usually have U-bends at the ends for making mechanical attachment, like the springs in drum brakes, as shown at this other post:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=394960

And compression springs would usually have flat ends, for the same reason. Maybe the main difference between compression and tension springs, is just how they are mechanically finished at the ends, based on how they are used mechanically? (I could be wrong of course)
 
Fundamentally, there's no reason a spring can't be put into tension and also compression (not at the same time of course). :wink:
 
For clarification, this is something along the lines of what I had in mind:

berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF. I'm an EE, not an ME, so I'm of limited help. I do have to ask the obvous question, though, can you just use two coaxial springs for your setup? A tension spring inside a compression spring, with appropriate mechanical connections made to both at each end?

(...)

And compression springs would usually have flat ends, for the same reason. Maybe the main difference between compression and tension springs, is just how they are mechanically finished at the ends, based on how they are used mechanically? (I could be wrong of course)

Yes, the only real difference between compression and tension is the finish at the ends. However, that's the problem.

With the coaxial setup, when the system is at rest, the tension spring is at minimum length and the compression spring is at max length. Compressing the two further would cause the tension spring to buckle (Not so good). Extending them further would cause the compression spring to extend (Which is fine), but my problem is that I don't know how to mount the compression spring to transmit a tension force to it.

Q_Goest said:
Fundamentally, there's no reason a spring can't be put into tension and also compression (not at the same time of course). :wink:

"In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is."
That said, what kind of spring and how would you mount it?

The standard mount for a vehicle's leaf spring looks like it would work for transmitting compression and tension, but are leaf springs meant to be extended as well as compressed?
250px-Leafs1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If your coupling mechanism is selctive, then each spring could function as designed...
 
The test bed is meant to be operating at forces of up to 250 kN. At that range, I'd rather have a statically connected spring than trying to change out/reconnect springs in the middle of a test.
 
moatra said:
The test bed is meant to be operating at forces of up to 250 kN. At that range, I'd rather have a statically connected spring than trying to change out/reconnect springs in the middle of a test.

I didn't suggest that you have to change out springs during the test. Make it one assembly.
 
How about a conventional, closed and ground helical spring? Put U-bolt clamps around the ends to hold it to something like a flat plate.
 
Back
Top