Operators and eigenstates/values

  • Thread starter Thread starter nmsurobert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36

Homework Statement


Let the Hermitian operator A^ corresponding to the observable A have two eigenstates |a1> and |a2> with eigenvalues a1 and a2, respectively, where a1 ≠ a2. Show that A^ can be written in the form A^ = a1|a1><a1| + a2|a2><a2|.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I reached out the instructor for some guidance but I am still confused.
To my understanding i should start with A^|ψ>. Where |ψ> is some arbitrary spin state.
and i don't know where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The identity operator can be written as

$$
1 = |1\rangle \langle 1| + |2\rangle \langle 2| \\
$$

For example suppose ##|\psi\rangle = c_1 |1\rangle + c_2|2\rangle##
$$ |\psi \rangle = 1|\psi \rangle = |1\rangle \langle 1|\psi\rangle + |2\rangle \langle 2| \psi \rangle \\
= |1\rangle c1 + |2\rangle c2 \\
= |\psi \rangle
$$

Suppose you tried putting "1" on both sides of your operator?
 
Have you heard about completeness theorem?
 
Thank you zhaos, that's actually a lot of help.

Blue leaf, I have not heard of completeness theorem. But I will give it a Google!
 
Completeness theorem is exactly what zhaos wrote in the first equation in his post.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top