Opinion Please: Which of These LED Drive Circuit is Best?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating two LED drive circuit designs, particularly their effectiveness in controlling an LED indicator based on voltage levels. The first circuit uses an NPN transistor, while the second employs a PNP transistor for high-side switching. Key suggestions include modifying the connection of Q1 to better control Q3 and potentially adding an additional transistor for improved functionality. The final design successfully indicates different voltage levels with a single LED, demonstrating the challenges of high-side switching compared to low-side switching. Overall, the circuit now functions as intended, with the LED turning off above 11V.
jmcafee
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Your opinion, please. Does one of the two variations of this circuit offer a clear advantage, or is it a wash (see attached)?

This indicator circuit turns on the LED below 11V (set by the zener). The LED cathode must be at ground (it is actually part of a tri-color LED with a common cathode), so it cannot be in the collector circuit of an NPN.

Any suggestions on the transistor biasing?

Thanks for your comments.
 

Attachments

  • Schematic.gif
    Schematic.gif
    6.8 KB · Views: 506
Engineering news on Phys.org
The 2nd circuit is closest, but still not quite right. Thematically, you use a PNP BJT for high-side switches, as the 2nd circuit does. But the first NPN transistor Q1 should have its collector connected to Q3's base through the resistor, so that when Q1 turns on, it pulls down on Q3's base to turn it on. Re-draw the 2nd circuit that way, and re-simulate. Should work a lot better.

Welcome to the PF, BTW!
 
Thanks for the suggestion, Mike.
 
Thinking further about what you said, I'm not sure that your proposed action is what I need functionally (or maybe I don't understand). To reiterate, the LED is to be OFF above 11V.

I'm using Q1 as an inverter; when it is on, I want Q3 off (and the reciprocal). So I don't want to pull the Q3 base low when Q1 is saturated.
 
Last edited:
jmcafee said:
Thinking further about what you said, I'm not sure that your proposed action is what I need functionally (or maybe I don't understand). To reiterate, the LED is to be OFF above 11V.

I'm using Q1 as an inverter; when it is on, I want Q3 off (and the reciprocal). So I don't want to pull the Q3 base low when Q1 is saturated.

Ah, my bad, I missed where you mentioned the polarity. But circuit #2 still won't work, because Q1 can't pull its emitter up high enough to turn off Q3, given its base biasing. I'd suggest using an additional transistor instead -- use the configuration I mentioned in my previous post, and add an extra NPN stage in the middle to do the inversion.
 
Mike,

Thanks very much! This may not be exactly what you envisioned, but I'm sure it is close. Regardless, it now functions perfectly (my original design would never turn off the red LED).

I've attached the full schematic. It is a voltage monitor using a single LED indicator that lights red at 10-11.2V, amber at 11.2-12.2V, and green above 12.2V.

I learned an important lesson from you that high side switching is trickier to design than low side switching.

Jim
 

Attachments

  • Schematic full.gif
    Schematic full.gif
    15 KB · Views: 526
jmcafee said:
Mike,

Thanks very much! This may not be exactly what you envisioned, but I'm sure it is close. Regardless, it now functions perfectly (my original design would never turn off the red LED).

I've attached the full schematic. It is a voltage monitor using a single LED indicator that lights red at 10-11.2V, amber at 11.2-12.2V, and green above 12.2V.

I learned an important lesson from you that high side switching is trickier to design than low side switching.

Jim

Nice work, Jim. I'd say you have a future in circuit design! :biggrin:
 
Back
Top