Opinions All British Theoretical Physicists

AI Thread Summary
When considering postgraduate courses in Theoretical Physics at UK universities, key factors include the reputation of the institution, course content, and how each program aligns with future PhD aspirations. Durham is noted for offering a broader range of classes, which may appeal to those interested in various aspects of field theory. In contrast, Imperial College London is recognized for its strong reputation, particularly in quantum field theory and particle physics, which could enhance CV appeal. However, performance in the chosen program is ultimately more significant for PhD applications than the institution's prestige. The discussion highlights the importance of aligning course selection with personal academic interests and career goals.
sox
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm currently applying for 1 year postgraduate courses in Theoretical Physics at the following universities in the UK:

Durham - Physics Department

Imperial College London - Physics Department

Kings College London - Maths Department

The aim is to hopefully go on to a PhD after one of these courses.

I was wondering if anyone had any advice on choosing?

Like, which would be most useful on my CV for applying for PhD's? and which is considered the best place to learn?

University league tables aren't particularly useful in determining which is the best institution.

Any opinions from those in the know would be appreciated.

At the moment I'm swaying towards Durham because the classes cover a broader spectrum.

Opinions?

Thanks in advance.

sox :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have also applied for postgraduate courses this year in the UK. I have to choose now between either the "Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces" course at Imperial, or the Mathematical Tripos Part III at Cambridge. I think for theoretical physicists, intending to go into quantum field theory, particle physics and related fields, the course at Imperial is highly regarded. It is also more famous than Durham and Kings, so I guess it would look better on your CV. But if you're going onto a Ph.D, then I don't think that aspect would matter much compared to your performance.
 
Yeah, It's the Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces Course I'll be applying to as well (this week in fact).

The course at durham seems to offer a brooader range of classes than the imperial course. Alot of them concerned with different types or aspects of filed theory. That might interest you if your looking for a degree that focusses on that.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top