Opinions All British Theoretical Physicists

AI Thread Summary
When considering postgraduate courses in Theoretical Physics at UK universities, key factors include the reputation of the institution, course content, and how each program aligns with future PhD aspirations. Durham is noted for offering a broader range of classes, which may appeal to those interested in various aspects of field theory. In contrast, Imperial College London is recognized for its strong reputation, particularly in quantum field theory and particle physics, which could enhance CV appeal. However, performance in the chosen program is ultimately more significant for PhD applications than the institution's prestige. The discussion highlights the importance of aligning course selection with personal academic interests and career goals.
sox
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm currently applying for 1 year postgraduate courses in Theoretical Physics at the following universities in the UK:

Durham - Physics Department

Imperial College London - Physics Department

Kings College London - Maths Department

The aim is to hopefully go on to a PhD after one of these courses.

I was wondering if anyone had any advice on choosing?

Like, which would be most useful on my CV for applying for PhD's? and which is considered the best place to learn?

University league tables aren't particularly useful in determining which is the best institution.

Any opinions from those in the know would be appreciated.

At the moment I'm swaying towards Durham because the classes cover a broader spectrum.

Opinions?

Thanks in advance.

sox :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have also applied for postgraduate courses this year in the UK. I have to choose now between either the "Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces" course at Imperial, or the Mathematical Tripos Part III at Cambridge. I think for theoretical physicists, intending to go into quantum field theory, particle physics and related fields, the course at Imperial is highly regarded. It is also more famous than Durham and Kings, so I guess it would look better on your CV. But if you're going onto a Ph.D, then I don't think that aspect would matter much compared to your performance.
 
Yeah, It's the Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces Course I'll be applying to as well (this week in fact).

The course at durham seems to offer a brooader range of classes than the imperial course. Alot of them concerned with different types or aspects of filed theory. That might interest you if your looking for a degree that focusses on that.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top