Opinions on Replacing Oil: What's Next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wave41
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oil Opinions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the book "Out of Gas," which predicts a looming oil shortage within a decade, a claim that contradicts scientific consensus suggesting that this timeline is overly pessimistic. Participants explore potential alternatives to oil, including nuclear power, hydrogen, and clathrate technology, though the latter is not yet fully developed. Concerns are raised about rising oil prices as reserves become harder to access, with oil shale and tar sands being mentioned as viable but more expensive options. Additionally, there is a growing concern about future competition for water resources. Overall, while immediate oil shortages are debated, the conversation emphasizes the need for alternative energy sources and the economic implications of dwindling oil supplies.
wave41
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have a question I wanted to ask, or more like your opinions? I have read about the new book that rescently hit the book stores shelves, called Out of Gas. The books talks about the fact that we will run out of oil in less then a decate, which scientists say will not happen that soon. And also about the new ways that people will have to go about their needs..So what I wanted to ask is, what do you guys think we will use as a primary source to replace the oil? Nuclear power? Could it go as bad as coal or deeloped energy from the sun?...I think people will soon be not only fighting for oil but for water...if anyone interested read the book called water, it freaky what you may think will happen. Although Russia and Canada are pretty safe...
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
We are not going to run out of oil in the next ten years, but as supplies dwindle and the existing reserves get harder to reach the price will continue to rise. You should find quite a bit of interesting information in this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=29373

IMO, Go Hydrogen :smile:

This allows us to use a many sources for our energy supply.
In order to avoid duplicate threads, please keep any discussion of H2 in the thread linked.
 
Last edited:
I'd say: Go Clathrate
 
Although I'd say go clathrate also, the technology is not quite there yet to
tap into those resources. I think the big oil companies are investigating though.
While world liquid petroleum supplies are predicted to start dwindling in the next ten years, there is still oil in oil shale and tar sand, but it costs a bit more to extract. At current prices per bbl of crude oil, that option would now be cost effective.
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Back
Top