Optical instruments: Microscope and Telescope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the formulas for calculating the magnifying power (M.P.) of microscopes and telescopes, highlighting the use of sign conventions. For telescopes, the M.P. is calculated as M.P. = - (fobjective / feyepiece), indicating that the image is inverted. In microscopes, the formula is M.P. = - (g / fobjective) * (25 cm / feyepiece), where g is the tube length and 25 cm is the least distance of distinct vision. The difference between angular and linear magnification is illustrated through examples, showing that telescopes increase perceived angles without enlarging the actual image, while microscopes can produce larger images of small objects. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effectively utilizing optical instruments.
D. Wani
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
What are the different formulas for the calculation of magnifying power of a microscope and a telescope? And how would we use the sign conventions in them?
 
Science news on Phys.org
D. Wani said:
What are the different formulas for the calculation of magnifying power of a microscope and a telescope? And how would we use the sign conventions in them?

If the eye is relaxed for distant viewing, the telescope simply produces an
angular magnification equal to the ratio of the focal length of the objective to the focal length of the eyepiece,
so M.P. = - (fobjective / f eye piece) ( The negative sign indicates that the image is inverted.).

Magnifying power(M.P) of a microscope. = -(g /fobjective).{(25 cm)/feyepiece.} , where g is The tube length .
It is the distance between the secondary focal point of the objective and the primary focal point of the eyepiece.
25 cm. is the least distance of distinct vision of human eye.
here also the negative sign indicates that the image is inverted.
 
What is the difference between angular and linear magnification
 
D. Wani said:
What is the difference between angular and linear magnification
Perhaps I can illustrate this difference by using the two instruments to project their images onto a white screen. For instance, a telescope projecting the Sun's image on to a card and a microscope projecting an image of a cell on to a card. You will notice that the Sun's image is smaller than the actual object, but the cell's image is larger than the object. So the telescope does not make an image that is bigger than the original, but makes the eye think so by increasing the angles. I was taught to refer to "magnifying power" for telescopes, rather than magnification.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top