Optical Spectrum Analyzers - Confused on Units

AI Thread Summary
Optical spectrum analyzers (OSAs) can present resolution in both wavelength (nm) and frequency (Hz), which can be confusing for newcomers. The values provided by manufacturers represent measurement errors or differences in frequencies and wavelengths rather than direct conversions. Understanding that a change in frequency correlates to a change in wavelength clarifies how these units relate. By applying the speed of light in calculations, users can better grasp the relationship between the two measurements. Ultimately, comprehending these units is essential for effectively utilizing OSAs in spectral analysis.
cambridgejohn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I am new to these, and off the bat am confused by the units.

Manufacturers quote resolution either in units of length, e.g. 0.04 nm, or HZ. For example,

0.04 pm / 5MHz
0.16 pm / 20 MHz
0.8 pm / 100 MHz.

I am thrown by this since I thought frequency was the inverse of wavelength. I get the length part and can understand when I look at a plot of Power vs. Wavelength.

I know I am overlooking something obvious...please help!

Thanks!
John
 
Science news on Phys.org
The numbers are not frequencies and wavelengths. The are differences between (or errors in the measurement of) in frequencies and wavelengths.

If a frequency f has wavelength \lambda, then
a frequency of f + 5 Mhz has a wavelength of approximately \lambda - 0.04pm, and so on
 
Thanks. The error concept part helps. I can understand when a wavelength is being measured a higher resolution helps out, and that one needs to only buy an OSA which will discern a certain wavelength spectra. And I can understand how the difference part makes sense for the wavelength.

What are the units of the proportion between the frequencies and wavelengths measured?
 
ok. it all makes sense now. just needed to run through some numeric examples using the speed of light to get numbers. thanks again for your help.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top