Optics - Double Slit Irradiance of Fringes

peppies
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
[Solved] Optics - Double Slit Irradiance of Fringes

Homework Statement


A double slit diffraction pattern is formed using mercury green light at 546.1nm. Each slit has a width of 0.100mm (= b), slit separation is 0.400mm (=a). The pattern reveals that the fourth-order interference maxima are missing from pattern.

What is the irradiance of the first three orders of interference fringes, relative to the zeroth-order maximum?


Homework Equations


I = 4Io (sin(\beta)/\beta))^2 * (cos(\alpha))^2
\beta = 0.5kbsin(\theta)
\alpha = 0.5kasin(\theta)
k = (2(pi)/\lambda)


The Attempt at a Solution


I've been trying to figure this one out for days and the book never gave any practice problems or simple explanation on what to do here.

First I tried to solve for the first order interference fringe (m=1):

sin(\theta) = (m\lambda/a), then use this result to solve for alpha and beta in the two equations above and then finally solve for the sinc and cos^2 functions in the irradiance to find the ratio to the zeroth order fringe.

The answers in the back of the book for the first three orders are (0.8106, 0.4053, 0.09006) but I am not getting these.

The book I'm using is "Introduction to Opitics 3rd edition by Pedrotti"

Thanks
Best
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I solved it by using the RAD mode on my calculator rather than DEG.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top