Optimal Distance for Collision-Free Earth Orbit

  • Thread starter Thread starter keepit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Orbits
AI Thread Summary
To avoid collisions with man-made objects in Earth orbit, an altitude above low Earth orbit (LEO) is necessary. LEO typically ranges from about 100 to 1,200 miles, while geosynchronous orbits are around 26,000 miles. It is suggested that once an object is above LEO, the likelihood of encountering debris decreases significantly. Therefore, an altitude above LEO is recommended for minimizing collision risks. This discussion highlights the importance of altitude in ensuring collision-free orbits.
keepit
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
IN a relatively circular Earth orbit, how far away from Earth would you have to be in order to avoid collisions?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Collisions with what?
 
sorry, man made objects
 
keepit said:
sorry, man made objects

Ah. What do you know about the subject so far? What altitudes are used for the various low-Earth orbits? What altitude is used by geosynchronous satellites?
 
I should have been more explicit. Circular geosynchronous orbits, 26,000 miles as i understand it, is rarified as far as man made objects. I was wondering how far above Earth an object would have to be to have a high likelihood of not colliding with low Earth orbit objects and above.
 
To my understanding, once your out of LEO you've passed most of the debris.
 

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
View full post »

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Earth's orbit not perfect ellipse
Replies
19
Views
2K
B Terminology for motion in the solar system, ecliptic maybe?
Replies
13
Views
2K
B The Colors of The Moon (Doppler Effect)
Replies
3
Views
2K
Stargazing Does an Analemma visualize the Earth's actual orbit around the sun?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Nodal Precession: Satellites Orbiting Earth Explained
Replies
22
Views
3K
I New Developments In The Search For Planet X
Replies
2
Views
3K
I About the relation between number of sidereal and solar days
Replies
27
Views
3K
I Planetary Formation: Could Collisions Explain Our Solar System?
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
I A very small object following Earth in the same orbit
Replies
9
Views
3K
I Database of binary star data info within 10 PC of Earth
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top