Optimal distance to accelerate projectile

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the optimal distance for coils in a mass accelerator project. It highlights the balance needed between coil proximity and the effective acceleration of the projectile. The ideal setup allows the coils to exert sufficient force to initiate movement without losing influence due to excessive distance. Experimental methods are suggested as a way to find this optimal distance, although mathematical calculations and numerical simulations are acknowledged as more complex but possible. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of both experimental and theoretical approaches in optimizing coil placement for effective projectile acceleration.
NeutronFusion
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi! I am recently involved in a project with a friend. We are trying to build a mass accelerator and thus, I figured that I need to know the optimal distance to place the coils and the winds on the coil. My thought was that if we place the coils too close, the coils wouldn't accelerate the projectile very far, but if it is too far, the coils won't have much influence on the projectile. Can someone please help with this? Thank you! Providing a way to figure it out would be nice!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
At the ideal point, the force from the coils is just sufficient to get the projectile moving, assuming you can power your coils long enough. This should be easy to figure out experimentally.
 
mfb said:
This should be easy to figure out experimentally.
Ok but is there anyway to mathematically calculate it?
 
With numerical simulations, sure. Simulations with magnetic fields influencing ferromagnetic materials tend to be complicated.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top