Optimizing 4-slit Interference Pattern for θ1st Min with Homework Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thefox14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference Slit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angle θ for the first minimum in a 4-slit interference pattern with slits spaced 2μm apart and light of wavelength 450 nm. The initial approach mistakenly used the two-slit interference formula, resulting in an incorrect angle of 6.45 degrees, while the correct angle is 3.22 degrees. The correct method involves using the intensity equation for four slits, which requires summing the contributions from all slits to find where the intensity goes to zero. The final formula derived is sin(θ) = (mλ)/(Nd), where N represents the number of slits. The discussion highlights the complexity of understanding multi-slit interference patterns.
Thefox14
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4-slit interference pattern is created by 4 slits spaced 2μm apart. At what approximate angle θ does the intensity go to zero the first time, if the incoming light has a wavelength of 450 nm?
θ1st min =

Homework Equations


d*sinθ = m\lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought this problem was as simple as using the above equation, setting dsinθ = \lambda/2 and solving for θ. When I did, I got 6.45 degrees; but the correct answer is supposed to be 3.22 degrees.

Why would the angle I got be 2x the angle I'm looking for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thefox14 said:
... dsinθ = \lambda/2 ...
That is for two-slit interference.

For four slits, you need to combine waves from all four slits and have sum to zero.
 
Redbelly98 said:
That is for two-slit interference.

For four slits, you need to combine waves from all four slits and have sum to zero.

Oh duh! haha thanks I got it now.

For anyone else who comes across this, though, here is what I did:

I_{f} = I(\frac{sin(N\theta/2)}{sin(\theta/2)})^{2}

So intensity will go to zero if we get the top part in the fraction to be 0. Then we know sin is zero in multiples of pi. So after that you get this equation:

N\theta/2 = m*pi

Simplify that and you end up with sin\theta = \frac{m\lambda}{Nd}
 
Kind of off-topic, this had to be the worst part of class for me to be honest. Completely uninteresting and overall hard concept to grasp (for me).

@above that's a good idea because I hated it when I needed help asap and finally found a thread with my question but no help :p
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top