Optimizing astable multivibrator for minimum power consumption

AI Thread Summary
To optimize an astable multivibrator for minimum power consumption using BJT transistors, it is crucial to select the lowest possible capacitance and operating voltage while maximizing resistor values. The optimum configuration involves equal capacitor values (C1=C2) and matching resistor pairs (R1=R4, R2=R3). Utilizing low-power transistors, such as FET or JFET types, can further enhance efficiency. The specific values for resistors and capacitors will vary based on the chosen transistors, desired waveform shape, and load impedance. Understanding these components is essential for achieving effective power optimization in the circuit design.
aeftimia
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
In short, if I want a given frequency, and I use BJT transistors, what would be the optimum capacitors and resistors in a multivibrator.

Example:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...tivibrator.svg

So, what are the optimum values C1=C2, R1=R4, and R2=R3?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Don't use transistors.
Use operational amplifier Nation Semiconductor type LMC6041.
Use circuit figure 11 from LMC6041 data sheet.
 
I know the best way to go is to get the thing built on a chip. I was trying to understand how the chip works in terms of components I understand--i.e. transistors, resistors, capacitors, and diodes.
 
This is not my area of expertise, so someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Use the lowest power transistors available. ? Probably FET or JFet transistors?
The energy stored in the capacitors each cycle is wasted, so use the lowest possible capacitance.
Use the lowest possible operating voltage.
Use the highest resistance resistors possible.
The actual value of the resistors and capacitors will depend on the transistors that are used, the wave shape requirements and the load impedance.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top