Optimizing Boat Hull Shape for Maximum Speed: A Calculus of Variations Approach

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the optimal shape of a boat hull to maximize speed, framed as a problem in Calculus of Variations. The initial inquiry compares the hull shape problem to calculating the speed of a sphere in water, highlighting the complexity of the task. A conceptual approach is proposed, focusing on minimizing an integral that represents frictional forces on the hull, with the shape defined as a function above the x-y plane. The conversation explores the formulation of the problem, including the use of Euler's equation for single-variable functions and the need for an equivalent for double integrals. The thread emphasizes the mathematical challenges involved in finding the hull shape that minimizes resistance and maximizes speed.
Bafsemann
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Was wondering if it was possible to derive the best possible shape of a boat hull to achieve maximum speed? As it is the equation on how to calculate the speed of a sphere moving in water... or else I am just totally wrong and you can bluntly ignore this post :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's an extremely difficult problem. Since you are trying to find the shape- i.e. a function- that maximizes a property it is a "Calculus of Variations" problem.
 
Bafsemann said:
Was wondering if it was possible to derive the best possible shape of a boat hull to achieve maximum speed? As it is the equation on how to calculate the speed of a sphere moving in water... or else I am just totally wrong and you can bluntly ignore this post :-p

Guys, I'm just interested in this Ok; know very little about the Calculus of variation. Could someone at least formulate the problem? Let me begin with a conceptual approach:

Assume we have the shape of the boat in the form of a surface above the x-y plane. Now it seems to me that this surface can be a very nicely behaved function. The speed of the boat, I'll just guess will be a function of frictional forces which in turn are dependent on the shape of the surface as well as the boundary which I'll call \Omega. Now, let me take a leap of faith:

We wish to minimize the following integral which sums up all the frictional forces on the hull:

I=\int\int_{\Omega} G[x,y,f(x,y),f_x,f_y]ds

Where G is some functional relationship of these forces to the shape of the hull (and I suppose it's slopes as well) and our objective is to find f(x,y) which minimizes the integral (constrained by realistic limits of course, such as manufacturing ones).

I know for the simple case of a function of a single variable f(x), wishing to minimize the integral:

I=\int_a^b F(x,y,y')dx

we can do some calculus and come up with Euler's equation which must be satisfied:

\frac{\partial F}{\partial y}-\frac{d}{dx} \frac{\partial F}{\partial y'}=0

I suppose there is an equivalent one for a double integral? How about for just any old integral of that form say for:

I=\int_0^1\int_0^1 (f+f_x+f_y)dxdy

How would I find the function f(x,y) which minimizes (or maximized) this integral)? Am I getting off-subject?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top