Optimizing Heat Engines: Finding the Temperature of the Hot Reservoir

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the temperature of the hot reservoir for a heat engine, given its efficiency and the velocities of a train accelerated by both a real and an ideal engine. A 20% efficient real engine accelerates the train to 5 m/s, while an ideal Carnot engine can achieve 6.5 m/s with the same fuel. The efficiency of the Carnot engine is derived from the temperatures of the hot and cold reservoirs, with air at 300 K as the cold reservoir. Participants clarify misconceptions about the efficiency of real versus ideal engines and provide equations to relate work done to kinetic energy and heat input. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between engine efficiency, work, and temperature in solving the problem.
andrew410
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
A 20% efficient real engine is used to speed up a train from rest to 5 m/s. It is known that an ideal (Carnot) engine using the same cold and hot reservoirs would accelerate the same train from rest to a speed of 6.5 m/s using the same amount of fuel. The engines use air at 300 K as a cold reservoir. Find the temperature of the steam serving as the hot reservoir.

I don't know how the velocity comes into play in order to get the temperature of the steam serving as the hot reservoir. I know that the formula for efficiency is
e = \frac {W_{eng}} {|Q_{h}|}.
Any help would be great! thx! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can anyone help ?
 
I think I got it maybe...
Since efficiency of a Carnot engine is
e = 1 - \frac {T_{c}} {T_{h}}
and e = .2.
So, we can reorder the formula to get,
T_{h} = \frac {T_{c}} {1-e}
What I am confused about is then why do they give us the initial and final velocity of each engine?
 
andrew410 said:
I think I got it maybe...
Since efficiency of a Carnot engine is
e = 1 - \frac {T_{c}} {T_{h}}
and e = .2.
So, we can reorder the formula to get,
T_{h} = \frac {T_{c}} {1-e}
What I am confused about is then why do they give us the initial and final velocity of each engine?

You're wrong and have a misconception. The efficiency of a Carnot engine is not 0.2. Your problem states:

"A 20% efficient real engine is used to speed up a train from .."

A real engine is not a Carnot engine. That phrase also not mean the efficiency of the engine is the 20% of the carnot efficiency.

Let' see:

v_1=5m/s
v_2=6.5m/s
m=mass of the train
m_f=mass of the fuel employed in combustion.
L_i= Caloric power or combustion enthalpy.

From this phrase: "It is known that an ideal (Carnot) engine using the same cold and hot reservoirs would accelerate the same train from rest to a speed of 6.5 m/s using the same amount of fuel. The engines use air at 300 K as a cold reservoir." one can write:

\eta_{carnot}=\frac{W}{Q_h}=1-\frac{T_c}{T_h}=\frac{1/2 m v_2^2}{m_f L_i} because you need to produce a work equal to the kinetic energy needed, and the combustion heat is the fuel mass multiplied by the combustion enthalpy. So that we have the first equation:

1-\frac{T_c}{T_h}=\frac{1/2 m v_2^2}{m_f L_i} (1);

From this phrase: "A 20% efficient real engine is used to speed up a train from rest to 5 m/s." one can write again:

\eta_{real engine}=0.2=\frac{W}{Q_h}=\frac{1/2 m v_1^2}{m_f L_i} (2)

Dividing (1) and (2) we have:

\frac{1-\frac{T_c}{T_h}}{\eta_{real engine}}=\Big(\frac{v_2}{v_1}\Big)^2

and solve for T_h.

You should know that going straightforward to the solution is not always the best way for solving a problem. They might be more difficult than we could think.
 
thx for the help!
I did think about the problem first, but that's all I could think of. yea...I need to study more or something...I'm not fully understanding the material...
anyways, thanks for the help again! :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top