Optimizing Implicit Functions: Best Fit for Coupled ODE Solutions

P3X-018
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to make a least squares fit with a function given implicitly, because the equation isn't solveable analyticly? Because I had the coupled ODE,

\ddot{x} = \omega^2x + 2\omega\dot{y} - C\,\frac{\dot{x}}{\dot{r}}

\ddot{y} = \omega^2y - 2\omega\dot{x} - C\,\frac{\dot{y}}{\dot{r}}

where \dot{r} = \sqrt{\dot{x}^2+\dot{y}^2}, and \omega and C are constants in time.
I can numerically solve this system and make a plot in x-y, but I also have some measurement data, so is there a way to make best fit of the "solution" to the data points? That is vary the 2 constants to make a best fit?
There are also the 4 initial conditions when solving this system of ODE, how will they be involved in this?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Of course you can measure the distance between your measurement data and the solution you calculated. I would use regression methods, depending on the degree of the solution. The origin of the data (the ODE solution) shouldn't bother you. If you want to calculate the constants by a best fit you will get an optimization problem, which probably needs again a numerical solution.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top