Optimizing Price for Tins of Volume 535cm^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter danago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the price for tins with a volume of 535cm^3, where the cost of metal for the base and top is double that of the walls. Initial equations for surface area, volume, and cost were established, leading to a cost function dependent on the radius of the base. The next step involves minimizing this cost function using calculus, specifically by setting the derivative equal to zero. The final calculations yield an optimal base radius of 3.5 and a height of 14 for the tin. The conversation emphasizes the importance of eliminating constants and correctly applying calculus to find the minimum cost.
danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
"A company is to produce tins of volume 535cm^3. The cost of the metal per square meter for the base and top is twice the cost of the walls. What base radius and tin height should be used for an optimal price?"

First i wrote equations for the surface area, volume, and cost.

<br /> \displaylines{<br /> A_{Side} = 2\pi rh \cr <br /> A_{Ends} = 2\pi r^2 \cr <br /> C_{Side} = x(2\pi rh) \cr <br /> C_{Ends} = 2x(2\pi r^2 ) \cr <br /> C = 2x(2\pi r^2 + \pi rh) \cr}<br /> 535 = \pi r^2 h\therefore h = \frac{{535}}{{\pi r^2 }}<br />

I then rewrote my cost equation, replacing 'h' with an expression in terms of 'r'.
<br /> C = 2x(2\pi r^2 + \frac{{535}}{r})<br />

So now i have an equation for cost, in terms of x (the cost of the metal for the walls of the tin), and r (the radius of the base/top). Have i gone about it the right way? If so, what should i do next? can i just cancel the x off?

Thanks,
Dan.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes your initial working is absolutely correct.
All you have to do now is to minimise the final cost function C using calculus . Remember that x is a constant here and so the only variable is r.
 
arunbg said:
Yes your initial working is absolutely correct.
All you have to do now is to minimise the final cost function C using calculus . Remember that x is a constant here and so the only variable is r.

ok. So using the product rule i get:
<br /> C&#039; = 2x(4\pi r - \frac{{535}}{{r^2 }})<br />

But I've still got two variables.
 
You have to actually set \frac{dC}{dr}=0 for minimum.
Also remember that x is a constant and can be eliminated.
Now find r.
 
Last edited:
ok i see what do do now. If i had actually taken the time to continue with my working instead of automatically think it was wrong, i would have got it :)

So since
<br /> 2x(4\pi r - \frac{{535}}{{r^2 }}) = 0<br />

I divide everything by 2x, which ends up cancelling the x anyway :) And the answer would be r=3.5, and h=14 :)

Thanks a lot for the help :P
 
You're welcome.:D
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top