Optimizing Pulling Force: Solving for Theta and F in Newton's Laws

  • Thread starter Thread starter Airsteve0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws
AI Thread Summary
To optimize the pulling force on a block moving at constant velocity on a horizontal surface, the angle theta should be determined using the equation u = tan(theta_naught). The smallest pulling force F can be calculated with the formula F = (uMg)/sqrt(1 + u^2). The discussion highlights the relationship between the forces in the x and y directions, where the frictional force is represented as Fx = uN. The confusion arises regarding the relationship between Fy and N, suggesting that Fy must equal u^2N for the book's solution to hold. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
A large block of mass M is going to be pulled with a constant velocity along a horizontal surface. The coefficient of friction between the surface and block is u.

(1) Find the angle theta=theta_naught that the direction of pull shall make with the direction of motion for the pulling force to be as small as possible.
(2) Find this smallest value of F.


Ok so I know the answers are:
(1) u = tan (thets_naught)
(2) F = (uMg)/sqrt(1 + u^2)

however I have no idea how these answers were arrived at. Could someone please offer some assisstance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you give it a try? Hint: Find the force as a function of theta.

(Five laws?)
 
Solving this system I was able to get to the solution:

tan(theta) = Fy/Fx (forces in x and y-directions)

However, I believe Fx equals the frictional force (uN) so the only way to arrive at the solution posted in the book would be if Fy = u^2N, which seems very strange.
 
Airsteve0 said:
However, I believe Fx equals the frictional force (uN) so the only way to arrive at the solution posted in the book would be if Fy = u^2N, which seems very strange.
Strange but true. (Not sure why you'd have an opinion about that.)
 
Doc Al said:
(Five laws?)

I think the five laws would be
3 laws of motion
1 of gravitation
1 of restitution
(though the last 2 arent applied here! :smile:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top