Optimizing Sound Systems for Varied Frequencies: Amplify or Dampen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Sound
AI Thread Summary
Sound systems often address the varying sensitivity of human hearing across the audio spectrum by amplifying both very high and very low frequencies to compensate for reduced sensitivity at these extremes. The discussion highlights that the human ear is most sensitive in the middle of the audible range, requiring less sound pressure for perceived loudness. Some participants suggest that if frequencies fall outside human hearing, no adjustments are necessary. The conversation emphasizes that the approach may vary by sound system and its intended application. Understanding equal-loudness contours can provide insight into how sound systems optimize frequency response.
Mike77
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Because the sensitivity of the human ear varies over the audio spectrum, how do many sound systems handle very high frequencies and very low frequencies, respectively, to compensate?

1. amplify; do nothing to
2. dampen; dampen
3. amplify; dampen
4. dampen; amplify
5. amplify; amplify
6. do nothing to; amplify
7. dampen; do nothing to
8. Sound systems do nothing to compensate.
9. do nothing to; dampen

HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's kind of a vague question. I'm not sure, but I think that the sensitivity probably peaks somewhere in the middle of the audible frequency range, and then falls off as you go to both higher and lower frequencies. So, IF that is true, and if "very high frequencies" and "very low frequencies" refer to the two extreme ends of the range of human hearing, then the sensible thing to do would seem to be to amplify both to make up for the lowered sensitivity at either end.

On the other hand, if "very high" and "very low" refer to frequencies that are beyond the range of human hearing in the first place, then the sensible thing to do would be to do nothing.

This answer is a complete guess based on what I think is common sense. I have no idea what "sound systems" do in reality. (The answer is probably: it depends on the sound system and its application).
 
it was correct! thanks!
 
Heh, ok. Which one was correct? "Amplify both" or "Do nothing?"

I found this article backing up some of my wild suppositions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal-loudness_contours

As you can see from the plot of "equal loudness" contours, at the two ends of the spectrum, a larger sound pressure level is required in order to produce the same "loudness." In the middle, a much lower sound pressure produces the same perceived loudness (because the human ear is more sensitive there). So this curve basically looks like an inversion of what the sensitivity curve must look like.

EDIT: Although there seems to be a dip in the sensitivity at around 10 kHz (which appears as a peak on this graph). Interesting.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top