Optimizing the area of a rectangle inside a racetrack

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlp248
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Rectangle
dlp248
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Maximize the area (in feet) of the rectangular field inside of a mile long racetrack.

Homework Equations



Circumference of a circle = 2πr
P= 2x + 2y

The Attempt at a Solution



Area of the semicircles = πr^2
Area of the rectangle = 2rh

A(r) = πr^2 +2rh
P= 2πr + 2h + 4r

5280ft = 2πr + 2h + 4r

h= 2640 - πr - 2r

A(r) = πr^2 + 2r(2640 - πr - 2r)
A(r) = πr^2 + 5280r - 2πr^2 - 4r^2
A(r) = 5280r - πr^2 - 4r^2

A'(r) = 5280 - 2πr -8r
0 = 5280 - 2πr -8r
2πr + 8r = 5280
r(2π + 8) = 5280

r = 5280/(2π + 8) ft
r ≈ 369.67 ft

A"(r) = -2π - 8
A"(r) < 0
r is a maximum

h = 2640 - (5280/(2π + 8))π - 2(5280/(2π + 8))
h = 10560/(2π + 8) ft
h ≈ 739.33 ft

A(r) = πr^2 +2rh
A(r) = π(5280/(2π + 8) ft)^2 + 2((5280/(2π + 8) ft)(10560/(2π + 8) ft))
A(r) ≈ 975,917 ft^2

I believe this answer is incorrect because for the perimeter, I included the two diameters of the semicircles (the width of the imaginary rectangle). So I ended up using part of the given distance to make these sides and my perimeter formula does not represent the actual perimeter of the track. I tried to redo this problem just using:

P= 2πr + 2h

however this formula produces an r value that makes the h value equal zero. Obviously I am missing a small detail and I have no idea what it is!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dlp248 said:

Homework Statement



Maximize the area (in feet) of the rectangular field inside of a mile long racetrack.

Homework Equations



Circumference of a circle = 2πr
P= 2x + 2y

The Attempt at a Solution



Area of the semicircles = πr^2
Area of the rectangle = 2rh

A(r) = πr^2 +2rh
P= 2πr + 2h + 4r

5280ft = 2πr + 2h + 4r

This is one of those problems where a simple sketch can go a long way to clarify what needs to be done to find a solution.

Note: you can also express the circumference of a circle using the diameter, which is also one of the dimensions of the rectangle. It's not clear why you included the area of the semicircles in your calculations, since the OP explicitly specified the area of the rectangular field in side the track is the quantity to be maximized.

So I ended up using part of the given distance to make these sides and my perimeter formula does not represent the actual perimeter of the track. I tried to redo this problem just using:

P= 2πr + 2h

however this formula produces an r value that makes the h value equal zero. Obviously I am missing a small detail and I have no idea what it is!

You went to great pains to show your calculations for an obviously incorrect solution, but you have omitted the calculations which supposedly use the correct formula for the perimeter of the race track. We can't help unless you show your latest work. :sorry:
 
I am not sure how to add a sketch to this post; It is a rectangle with two semicircle ends. This is the rest of my work:

P= 2πr + 2h

5280 = 2πr + 2h
h = 2640 - πr

A(r) = πr^2 + 2rh

A(r) = πr^2 + 2r(2640 - πr)
A(r) = πr^2 + 5280r - 2πr^2
A(r) = 5280r - πr^2

A'(r) = 5280 - 2πr
0 = 5280 - 2πr
r = 5280/2π
r = 2640/π

h = 2640 - π(2640/π)
h = 0

Now that you mention that I am using the area of the circle in my formula I think I see where I am going wrong. I am definitely over thinking this. I wonder if I should be using these two formulas instead of the others I have been using:

P= 2πr + 2h
A(r) = 2rh

Using
h = 2640 - πr

I just need to plug this h value into the area of the rectangle, differentiate, and solve for r. Let me know if that is on the right track. Thank you!
 
Here is my attempt at a sketch:
 

Attachments

  • 20150415_181057.jpg
    20150415_181057.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 463
dlp248 said:
I just need to plug this h value into the area of the rectangle, differentiate, and solve for r. Let me know if that is on the right track. Thank you!
Try it and see what you get.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top