OR Gate Voltage Drop: A=5V, B=4.6V

AI Thread Summary
In the discussed OR gate scenario, with input A at 5V and input B at 4.6V, the output voltage is expected to be around 4.4V due to the forward biasing of diode D2, which has a smaller voltage drop than D1. The voltage drop across D2 is approximately 0.2V, indicating that the current through this diode is minimal. The behavior of the output voltage is influenced by the higher input from A, which effectively dictates the output despite the presence of B. To analyze the circuit further, applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and the diode equation can provide insights into the currents and voltages across the diodes. Understanding these principles will enhance comprehension of diode behavior in circuits.
dobry_den
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Hi! I've got another diode OR gate problem. When the voltage at the input A is 5V and it's 4.6V at the input B, does the output voltage still remain at 4.4V? Does it mean that the D2 diode is forward biased and its voltage drop* is smaller than the voltage drop of the D1 diode?

*the constant-voltage-drop is about 0.6V, thus the voltage drop across the D2 diode should be just about 0.2V

The attached image is a scheme of the OR Gate when A is 5V and B is 0V
 

Attachments

  • or_gate.GIF
    or_gate.GIF
    2.4 KB · Views: 532
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yeah, just the A input is enough to hold up the output. Just get familiar with the V-I plot for diodes, and their behavior will be a lot more intuitive.
 
Ok. So due to the 5V A input, the voltage-drop across the diode 2 will be quite small (just about 0.2). It's apparent from the V-I plot that the current going through this diode will be quite small. But what makes the A input to "dictate" the value of the output voltage? What prevents the output from being equal to 4.6 - voltage_drop_across_D2, which would increase the potential difference across the diode 1 and the current goint through this diode?
 
You basically can still write the KCL for this circuit, you just need to use the diode equation to express the current and voltage for the diode legs. Write the KCL, and then solve for the currents and voltages of the diodes. You can assume some pretty generic Is saturation current -- just work backwards from the basic diode equation, assume room temperature (in Kelvin) and a 0.6V forward diode drop at some reasonable current like 10mA. That will give you an Is that you can use in your KCL.

Diode Equation: I_d = I_s ( e^{\frac{q V}{k T}} - 1 )
 
Thanks very much for your replies...! Diodes will certainly require more interest and time from my side...:)
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top