Orbital and Spin Angular momentum of light derivation

calculo2718
Messages
25
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The momentum carried by an electromagnetic field is [;\vec{P}(\vec{x}, t) = \frac{1}{4\pi c} \int d\vec{x}\vec{E}(\vec{x},t) \times \vec{B}(\vec{x},t);]

show that for a finite field extension
[;\vec{J}(\vec{x}, t) = \frac{1}{4\pi c}\int -i A_i(\vec{x},t)\vec{L}E_i(\vec{x},t) + \vec{E}(\vec{x},t) \times \vec{A}(\vec{x},t) d\vec{x};] where [;\vec{J};] is the angular momentum, [;L = -ir \times \nabla;], and [;\vec{A};] is the vector potential in radiation gauge, i.e. [;A^0 = 0;] and [;\nabla \cdot \vec{A} = 0;] (hint: using partial integration)

Homework Equations


coulomb gauge [;\vec{B} = \nabla \times \vec{A};]

The Attempt at a Solution


There are some things in the wording in the problem that I do not understand so I am making some assumptions that may not even be true.

1) Finite field extension means that the field does NOT go to infinite so [;\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0;]
2) The subscripts in the [;-i A_i(\vec{x},t)\vec{L}E_i(\vec{x},t);] represents a sum.
3) I have no clue what partial integration is.
[;\int \vec{x} \times (\vec{E} \times \vec{B}) d\vec{x};]
[;\int \vec{x} \times (\vec{E} \times (\nabla \times \vec{A})) d\vec{x};]
using triple product expansion
[;\int \vec{x} \times (\nabla(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{A}) - \vec{A}(\vec{E}\cdot \nabla)) d\vec{x};]
distributing the [;\vec{x} \times;]
[;\int \vec{x} \times \nabla(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{A}) - \vec{x} \times \vec{A}(\vec{E}\cdot \nabla) d\vec{x};]

This is where I get stuck. If I assume that [;\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0;], I have no idea where to get the [;\vec{E} \times \vec{A};] term in the answer I am supposed to get. If I don't assume that, I try to expand my [;\nabla(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{A});] term using some vector identity the [;\nabla \cdot \vec{E};] cancels anyway and I simply get the equation in my second line of work.

My gut tells me that I missing something having to do with this "partial integration" business. I have googled this and I get it as an alternative term to integration by parts or as integrating a partial derivative. If I am to integrate by parts, what am I integrating by parts? I don't have a product of two functions I have different vector products of different vector fields. If I am supposed to integrate some partial derivative, which one? I have so many!

please help, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your TeX formulas get displayed properly if you enclose them in $$ or ## (inline mode). Currently they are hard to read.
 
mfb said:
Your TeX formulas get displayed properly if you enclose them in $$ or ## (inline mode). Currently they are hard to read.
I can't seem to edit the post so I am re-posting here.

Homework Statement


The momentum carried by an electromagnetic field is $$\vec{P}(\vec{x}, t) = \frac{1}{4\pi c} \int d\vec{x}\vec{E}(\vec{x},t) \times \vec{B}(\vec{x},t)$$

show that for a finite field extension
$$\vec{J}(\vec{x}, t) = \frac{1}{4\pi c}\int -i A_i(\vec{x},t)\vec{L}E_i(\vec{x},t) + \vec{E}(\vec{x},t) \times \vec{A}(\vec{x},t) d\vec{x}] where $\vec{J}$$ is the angular momentum, $$L = -ir \times \nabla$, and [\vec{A}$$ is the vector potential in radiation gauge, i.e. $$A^0 = 0$$ and $$\nabla \cdot \vec{A} = 0$$ (hint: using partial integration)

Homework Equations


coulomb gauge $$\vec{B} = \nabla \times \vec{A}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


There are some things in the wording in the problem that I do not understand so I am making some assumptions that may not even be true.

1) Finite field extension means that the field does NOT go to infinite so $$\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0$$
2) The subscripts in the $$-i A_i(\vec{x},t)\vec{L}E_i(\vec{x},t)$$ represents a sum.
3) I have no clue what partial integration is.
$$\int \vec{x} \times (\vec{E} \times \vec{B}) d\vec{x}$$
$$\int \vec{x} \times (\vec{E} \times (\nabla \times \vec{A})) d\vec{x}$$
using triple product expansion
$$\int \vec{x} \times (\nabla(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{A}) - \vec{A}(\vec{E}\cdot \nabla)) d\vec{x}$$
distributing the $$\hat{x}\times$$
$$\int \vec{x} \times \nabla(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{A}) - \vec{x} \times \vec{A}(\vec{E}\cdot \nabla) d\vec{x}$$

This is where I get stuck. If I assume that $$\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0$$, I have no idea where to get the $$\vec{E} \times \vec{A}$$ term in the answer I am supposed to get. If I don't assume that, I try to expand my $$\nabla(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{A})$$ term using some vector identity the $$\nabla \cdot \vec{E}$$ cancels anyway and I simply get the equation in my second line of work.

My gut tells me that I missing something having to do with this "partial integration" business. I have googled this and I get it as an alternative term to integration by parts or as integrating a partial derivative. If I am to integrate by parts, what am I integrating by parts? I don't have a product of two functions I have different vector products of different vector fields. If I am supposed to integrate some partial derivative, which one? I have so many!

please help, thanks!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top