Orbital dynamics: "The familiar arc-cosine form"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the arc-cosine form of an integral related to planetary motion, as presented in Joos's work. The expression in question involves integrating a function of the form -∫(1/√(a + 2bx - hx²)) dx, which is claimed to equal (1/√h) arccos[(b - hx)/√(a + b²h)]. The author struggles with confirming this identity and expresses difficulty in manipulating the equations to derive the arc-cosine form. They highlight a potential mistake regarding a missing minus sign and seek clarification on how to derive the familiar form from first principles. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the transformation leading to the arc-cosine representation.
Odious Suspect
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
This arises in Joos's discussion of planetary motion, at the following URL:

https://books.google.com/books?id=wFl2MkpcY6kC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA91#v=onepage&q&f=false

I've modified the notation in obvious ways.

He asserts that the following expression is "the familiar arc-cosine form":

$$-\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{a+2 bx-hx^2}} \, dx=\frac{1}{\sqrt{h}}\arccos \left[\frac{b-hx}{\sqrt{a+b^2h}}\right]$$

It's not familiar to me, and I am having trouble confirming it. The following is the approach I have taken.

$$\theta =\arccos (u)$$

$$\cos (\theta )=u$$

$$-\sin (\theta ) \frac{d\theta }{dx}=\frac{du}{dx}$$

$$\frac{d\theta }{dx}=-\frac{\frac{du}{dx}}{\sin (\theta )}=-\frac{\frac{du}{dx}}{\sqrt{1-u^2}}$$

$$u=\frac{b-hx}{\sqrt{a+b^2h}}$$

$$\frac{du}{dx}=-h$$

$$\frac{d\theta }{h}=\frac{dx}{\sqrt{1-u^2}}=\frac{d\arccos (u)}{h}$$

I seem to lose a minus sign that appears in the original form, but that may not be significant.

$$\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-u^2}} \, dx=\frac{\arccos (u)}{h}$$

$$\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-u^2}} \, dx=\frac{\arccos (u)}{h}$$

$$\int \frac{1}{\frac{\sqrt{1-u^2}}{\sqrt{h}}} \, dx=\frac{\arccos (u)}{\sqrt{h}}$$

$$\frac{1-u^2}{h}=\frac{1}{h}\left(1-\frac{b^2-2 bhh+x^2x^2}{a+b^2h}\right)=\frac{a+b^2h-\left(b^2-2 bhh+x^2x^2\right)}{h\left(a+b^2h\right)}=\frac{a2 b+hhx-h^2x^2}{h\left(a+b^2h\right)}=\frac{a+2 bx-hx^2}{a+b^2h}$$

That's where I get stuck. Notice that the numerator in the final expression is identical to the radicand of the denominator of the lhs in the first equation. In order for that to work, ##a+b^2h=1## must hold. No matter how I try, I just can't seem to pound it into submission.

$$C+\theta =-\int \frac{2 c}{\sqrt{\left(v_0^2-\frac{2 GM}{r_0}\right)+2 GM\mu -4 c^2 \mu ^2}} \, d\mu$$

$$-\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{a+2 bx-hx^2}} \, dx=\frac{1}{\sqrt{h}}\arccos \left[\frac{b-hx}{\sqrt{a+b^2h}}\right]$$

$$x=\mu ;\text{Null}h=4 c^2;\text{Null}a=v_0^2-\frac{2 GM}{r_0};b=GM$$

$$a+b^2h=G^2 M^2+\left(V_0^2-\frac{2 GM}{r_0}\right)4c^2$$

How might I approach this problem effectively?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whoops! ##\frac{du}{dx}=\frac{-h}{\sqrt{a+b^2h}}##. I guess I have to embarrass myself before I can find my mistakes. I think that correction will get me most of the way there.

I would still like to understand where that "familiar form" came from. That is, how is it arrived at "working forward"?
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top