Orbits of a normal subgroup of a finite group

3029298
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If G is a finite group which acts transitively on X, and if H is a normal subgroup of G, show that the orbits of the induced action of H on X all have the same size.

The Attempt at a Solution


By the Orbit-Stabilizer theorem the size of the orbit induced by H on X is a divisor of H. This could certainly help... And H is normal, therefore H is the stabilizer of the action of conjugation. Plus the fact that points in the same orbit have conjugate stabilizers... I don't know how to put the elements together... Can anyone hint me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You really don't need anything fancy here. If x is an element of X then the orbit under H is Hx. If y is another element of X then there is a g in G such that y=gx (since G is transitive). So the orbit of y, Hy=Hgx. Now use that H is normal.
 
I think I see it now... Hy=Hgx=gHg-1gx=gHx, a left coset of Hx, which has the same size as Hx, since each product of g with a member of Hx is unique and together all these products fill out gHx. The number of products is exactly as big as the size of Hx. Therefore gHx and Hx have the same size.

Correct? Thanks (again!) for your help!
 
3029298 said:
I think I see it now... Hy=Hgx=gHg-1gx=gHx, a left coset of Hx, which has the same size as Hx, since each product of g with a member of Hx is unique and together all these products fill out gHx. The number of products is exactly as big as the size of Hx. Therefore gHx and Hx have the same size.

Correct? Thanks (again!) for your help!

Sure. That's correct. Not so hard, was it?
 
no :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top