I Order of "Extracted Factors" in SPSS Factor Analysis

WWGD
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,679
Reaction score
12,397
Hi All,
I am doing some FA on SPSS. I entered 9 columns from an Excel file into
SPSS. I am just not sure of how the order of the initial columns corresponds to the order
of the components that have been extracted; specifically, in the "total Variance Explained" section of the outputs. Would someone please please help me figure it out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The order of the columns of input data should have no effect on the order of the factors determined by FA. The factors are determined strictly by a statistical calculation that has nothing to do with the order of columns in the input data file. To test that, try changing the order of columns of the input file and run the SPSS program again. The FA process should not change.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Thanks, but, aren't the factors a subset of the input data? EDIT: I mean, don't we keep, out of the input factors, those that explain the most variability ( or whose eigenvalue in the correlation matrix is 1 or greater)?
 
I should have been more careful in how I said things. If the order of the input columns are changed, the FA results should remain statistically unchanged, although the FA results may refer to columns of data using the new column positions. That may not be answering your question. I should probably review how SPSS presents its results before I try to say more.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
The listing of the factors in the "Total Variance Explained" table are listed in order of greatest to least. When you select the top one, it should trace back to the same information regardless of the order of columns in the input file. That factor can be traced back to the columns by referring to either the "Component Matrix" table, the "Pattern Matrix" table, or the "Structure Matrix" table, depending on the particular method you are using. Large numbers in the table indicate the columns of input data that make up most of that factor.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Back
Top