Organic Chemistry of Bruice 5th edition problem

AI Thread Summary
A user is seeking help with homework assignments from the Organic Chemistry of Bruice 5th edition while waiting for their book delivery. They request specific problem questions from various pages, indicating a sense of urgency to submit for credit. Another user offers to help with the 4th edition but expresses concern about potential discrepancies in problem order between editions. The original poster remains apprehensive about using the 4th edition due to these differences. Overall, the discussion centers on the need for access to specific problems from the 5th edition for timely homework completion.
yellow_river
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I bought the book online, so now I'm waiting for its delivering. But I have to submit the homework assignments for credit. Could anybody who have the Organic Chemistry of Bruice 5th edition, please post the question of these problems for me? Thank you soooooooooooooo much !

*page 67: 68, 69, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76
*page 68: 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 84
*page 69: 85, 86, 87, 89, 90, 91
*page 58: 92
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've got the 4th ed; is that of help?
 
To Cesium: Thank you for your concern. But I'm afraid that the order of homework problems maybe be messed up between 4th and 5th. :(
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Final Grades for Linear Algebra Course
Replies
3
Views
2K
Can You Decode This List of Numbers into a Message?
Replies
18
Views
12K
Is this an impossible code challenge?
Replies
9
Views
3K
MCNP Tally f8 unreliable since neutron transport is nonanalog
Replies
3
Views
3K
Comp Sci Counting Numbers in Curly Braces in Fortran?
Replies
12
Views
2K
Comp Sci Trapezoidal rule for a set of data
Replies
6
Views
3K
Studying Skipping Chapters in Stewart’s Calculus? (Pearson's Edexcel IAL Background)
Replies
2
Views
121
Admissions Am I screwed graduate admission?
Replies
6
Views
2K
How many elements of order 50 are there in this group?
Replies
1
Views
5K
Mathematically modeling a real system in C#
Replies
36
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top