Orthogonal set - Geometric interpretation

shounakbhatta
Messages
287
Reaction score
1
Orthogonal set -- Geometric interpretation

Hello,

If we have two vectors u,v then in an inner product space, they are said to be orthogonal if <u,v>=0.

Well, orthogonal means perpendicular in Euclidean space, i.e. 90 degrees. How <u,v> becomes zero.

Secondly, if I have three vectors, v1,v2,v3 with certain values, computing, we get <v1,v2>=0
<v1,v3>=0
<v2,v3>=0

How will it look like in geometrical figure. I mean to say, what if we take these 3 vectors and put it on a picture and how it would look like?

Thanks,

-- Shounak
 
Physics news on Phys.org


shounakbhatta said:
Hello,

If we have two vectors u,v then in an inner product space, they are said to be orthogonal if <u,v>=0.

Well, orthogonal means perpendicular in Euclidean space, i.e. 90 degrees. How <u,v> becomes zero.

Secondly, if I have three vectors, v1,v2,v3 with certain values, computing, we get <v1,v2>=0
<v1,v3>=0
<v2,v3>=0

How will it look like in geometrical figure. I mean to say, what if we take these 3 vectors and put it on a picture and how it would look like?

Thanks,

-- Shounak
In R3, these will be three perpendicular vectors. For example, the standard basis vectors (1,0,0), (0,1,0), and (0,0,1).
In R2, this is not possible, unless at least one of the vectors is the zero vector.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top