Orthogonality in h^n for a field h

Josh Swanson
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Let V be a vector space over a field h and let n be a positive integer. Let f:V -> h^n be a linear map given by
f(v) = (f1(v), f2(v), ..., fn(v)). Call two vectors (g1, ..., gn) and (h1, ..., hn) in h^n "orthogonal" if

g1 h1 + ... + gn hn = 0

Suppose the only vector orthogonal to every vector f(v) is the 0 vector. Is f surjective?


Maybe I'm just missing something, but the only way I can see to get the result is to consider the orthogonal complement of the image of f, but that requires the codomain to be an inner product space, which h^n isn't in general. (In fact, in this application, h can be either a field of prime order or the rationals.)

This question was inspired by Andrea Ferretti's http://mathoverflow.net/questions/13322/slick-proof-a-vector-space-has-the-same-dimension-as-its-dual-if-and-only-if-it" that the dimension of an infinite dimensional vector space is less than that of its dual. I'm not convinced the end of the proof works out. Considering orthogonality in basically the situation I've outlined is suggested at the end of the comments by KConrad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let f(V) be our image. It is proven in www.maths.bris.ac.uk/~maxmr/la2/notes_5.pdf[/URL] that it still holds for every subspace W of [itex]h^n[/itex] that

[tex]\dim{W}+\dim{W^\bot}=n[/tex]

In particular (since [itex]f(V)^\bot=\{0\}[/itex])

[tex]\dim{f(V)}=n[/tex]

so our map is surjective.

EDIT: I should probably say why our "inner product" is non-degenerate, since I can imagine that this is not always the case. It's because [itex]f(V)^\bot=\{0\}[/itex], from which it follows that [itex](h^n)^\bot=\{0\}[/itex]. So the radical is {0}, which is equivalent to non-degeneracy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, wonderful, thanks for the link! I was hoping the result was still true outside of inner product spaces, and so it is. That completes the proof then.


P.S. Non-degeneracy can also be deduced easily without recourse to the existence of f from

(c_1, ..., c_i, ..., c_n) . (0, ..., 0, 1, 0, ..., 0) = c_i
so if c is orthogonal to h^n then
c . e_i = c_i = 0
so c = 0.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top