Orthogonality of Two Functions

White Ink
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that:

\varphi_{0}(x) = f_{0}(x)

and

\varphi_{1}(x) = f_{1}(x) - \frac{\left\langle\right\varphi_{0},f_{1}\rangle}{\left\|\varphi_{0}\right\|^{2}}\varphi_{0}(x)

are orthogonal on the interval [a,b].

Homework Equations



Orthogonal functions satisfy:

\left\langle\right\varphi_{m},\varphi_{n}\rangle = \int^{b}_{a}\varphi_{m}(x)\varphi_{n}(x)dx = g(m)\delta_{mn}

Where, \delta_{mn} is the Delta Kronecker.

Also:

\left\langle\right\varphi_{m},\varphi_{m}\rangle = \left\|\varphi_{m}\right\|^{2}

The Attempt at a Solution



Since m and n (0 and 1) are not equal, the Delta Kronecker is zero and therefore the proof is a matter of proving that:

\left\langle\right\varphi_{0},\varphi_{1}\rangle = 0

Having substituted the functions into the inner product formula in 2:

\left\langle\right\varphi_{0},\varphi_{1}\rangle = \int^{b}_{a}\varphi_{0}(x)\varphi_{1}(x)dx = <br /> \int^{b}_{a}f_{0}(x)\left[f_{1}(x) - \frac{\left\langle\right\varphi_{0},f_{1}\rangle}{\left\|\varphi_{0}\right\|^{2}}\varphi_{0}(x)\right]dx

Because the Delta Kronecker is zero, all I have to do is show that:

\int^{b}_{a}f_{0}(x)\left[f_{1}(x) - \frac{\left\langle\right\varphi_{0},f_{1}\rangle}{\left\|\varphi_{0}\right\|^{2}}\varphi_{0}(x)\right]dx = 0

I'm unsure as to whether I should use integration by parts to do the resulting integral because there is another integral embedded in the \varphi_{1}(x) function; which (because it is a definite integral) would be tricky to differentiate or integrate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You really don't need to bring the Kronecker delta stuff into the picture. It is completely superfluous. You do need to show that \langle \varphi_0, \varphi_1 \rangle = 0 as that is the definition of orthogonality.

Why integrate by parts? Use \langle f, g \rangle \equiv \int_a^b f(x)g(x)\,dx and \varphi_0(x) = f_0(x)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top