Orthogonality on Inner Product (Quantum Mechanics also)

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Consider a qubit in the state |v> ∈ ℂ^2. Suppose that a measurement of δn is made on the qubit. Show that the probability of obtaining the result "+1" in the measurement is equal to 0 if and only if |v> and |n,+> are orthogonal.

Homework Equations


Inner product axioms
|v>|w> are orthogonal if |v>|w> = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


First things first, that this is a if and only if proof.
a. Prob(+1) = 0 implies that |v> and |n,+> are orthogonal
b. |v> and |n,+> are orthogonal implies Prob(+1) = 0

Proof of b: Prob(+1) = | |n,+> |v> |^2 , but since |n,+> and |v> are orthogonal as assumed, by definition of orthogonality, this is equal to 0. And so Prob(+1) = 0.

Proof of a: Similarly, Prob(+1) = | |n,+> |v> |^2 and since this equals 0, we see that |n,+>|v> = 0. But this is precisely the definition of orthogonality.

My concern: My concern is mainly with the proof of a, it seems very weak. Would you consider this a proper proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One little bump before the week starts. :)
 
To make the proof less "handwavy", I would start from the fact that ##\left|\pm n \right\rangle## form a complete basis, i.e., one can always write
$$
\left|\psi \right\rangle = a \left| +n \right\rangle + b \left|-n \right\rangle
$$
and deduce things about the values of ##a## and ##b##.

Also, please note that the inner product is noted <v|w>, not |v>|w>. |v> is a column vector, and <v| a row vector.
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
Thanks for the help here. That's a good idea and may make it a stronger proof.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top