Oscillating rectangular plate

AI Thread Summary
To find the period of small oscillations for a rectangular plate suspended at its corner, the formula T = 2π(I/mgl)^(1/2) is used, where I is the moment of inertia and l is the length of the equivalent simple pendulum. The moment of inertia for the plate is correctly calculated as I = m/3(a^2 + b^2). The length l is determined to be the diagonal, l = (a^2 + b^2)^(1/2), which is also confirmed as correct. Some participants noted that while the calculations can become complex, simplifications may be possible by manipulating exponents. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physics principles despite potential complications in calculations.
shizzle
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
How do i find the period of small oscillations and length of the equivalent simple pendulum, for a rectangular plate (edges a and b) suspended at its corner and oscillating in vertical plane?

T = 2pi (I/mgl)^1/2
i calculated l (length) to be (a^2 + b^2 )^1/2 ---(the diagonal) is this right?

I = m/3 (a^2 + b^2)

when i try to plug this into T though, it gets nasty and I'm not sure this is right. help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shizzle said:
How do i find the period of small oscillations and length of the equivalent simple pendulum, for a rectangular plate (edges a and b) suspended at its corner and oscillating in vertical plane?
T = 2pi (I/mgl)^1/2
i calculated l (length) to be (a^2 + b^2 )^1/2 ---(the diagonal) is this right?
I = m/3 (a^2 + b^2)
when i try to plug this into T though, it gets nasty and I'm not sure this is right. help!

1.I guess last night's discussion really helped. :-p The moment of inertia is correct. :-p
2.The initial formula is correct.
3.The diagonal is correctly calculated and it is a vertical axis for equilibrium.
4.What if it gets nasty? :biggrin: Phyiscs is not always simple.

Daniel.
 
ha ha ha. I think it is possible to simplify it further actually. so...
can i simplify (a^2 +b^2) / (a^2 + b^2)^1/2 = (a^2 + b^2 )^1/2 ? simply playing with the exponents. ie. 1-1/2
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top