Oscillation above the Surface of the Earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the period of a pendulum at a height of 2.23 times the Earth's radius. The initial period on the Earth's surface is given as 7.23 seconds, and the relevant equations for the period and gravitational acceleration are provided. The user attempts to derive the new period by manipulating the equations but questions whether their approach is correct. Clarification is sought regarding the radius used in the gravitational formula, confirming that it should include the height above the Earth's surface. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately determining the effective radius for gravitational calculations.
yaylee
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pendulum consists of point mass Mo swinging on a massless string of length Lo, with period To = 7.23 s on the surface of the Earth (at RE, the radius of the Earth). Find T1, the period of the same pendulum if it swings on a horizontal platform of height H = 2.23RE (stationary, not orbiting) above the Earth's surface.


Homework Equations


T = 2∏√(L/g)
g = G * Mass of Earth/R^2, where R = radius of Earth


The Attempt at a Solution


Squaring both sides of the Period, T, equation, we get,

T on surface of Earth: T^2 = 7.23^2 = 4∏^2(L/g), = 4∏^2(L)*R^2 / (G)(Mearth), and,
T at 2.23R above the Earth: T^2 = 4∏^2(L)*(2.23R)^2 / (G)(Mearth)

Dividing both equations, and solving for T, T = √(7.23^2)(2.23)^2 = 16.1229

Am I doing something wrong here? Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yaylee said:
height H = 2.23RE (stationary, not orbiting) above the Earth's surface.

T at 2.23R above the Earth: T^2 = 4∏^2(L)*(2.23R)^2 / (G)(Mearth)
In the formula GMe/r2, what exactly is r?
 
Hi Haruspex,

This r should be (r PLUS 2.23R), or (R + 2.23R) = 3.23R ... Would I be correct here? Thank you for your assistance!
 
Go figure, it is! Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top