Pendulum swinging above earth's surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter rubenhero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Surface
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the period of a pendulum consisting of a point mass on a massless string, specifically when it is elevated above the Earth's surface. Participants explore the effects of gravitational acceleration on the pendulum's period at different heights, using the formulas for period and gravitational force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of gravitational acceleration at a height above the Earth's surface and how it affects the pendulum's period. There are questions about whether the radius used in the gravitational formula should include the height above the Earth's surface.

Discussion Status

Some participants have recalculated the gravitational acceleration using the corrected radius and derived a new period for the pendulum. There is acknowledgment of different methods to approach the problem, with some expressing interest in alternative calculation techniques. The discussion remains open with no explicit consensus on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly interpreting the radius in gravitational calculations, particularly when height above the Earth's surface is involved. There is mention of homework constraints and the potential for similar problems in future assessments.

rubenhero
Messages
41
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Assume all oscillators are frictionless.
a) A pendulum consists of point mass Mo swinging on a massless string of length Lo, with period To = 9.42 s on the surface of the Earth (at RE, the radius of the Earth). Find T1, the period of the same pendulum if it swings on a horizontal platform of height H = 2.96RE (stationary, not orbiting) above the Earth's surface.


Homework Equations


T = 2∏√(L/g) , g = GM/R2 , Radius of Earth = 6.37e6m, mass of Earth = 5.98e24kg


The Attempt at a Solution


g(T/2∏)2 = L
9.81m/s2√(9.42s/2∏)2 = 22.05012604m

g = GM/R2
(6.67e-11 * 5.98e24kg)/(2.96 * 6.37e6)2 = g1
3.98866e14/3.55518567e14 = 1.121927339m/s2 = g1

T1 = 2∏√(L/g1)
T1 = 2∏√(22.05012604/1.121927339)
T1 = 27.85499219s

The answer i calculated is wrong, any help with figuring out why it's wrong would be greatly appreciated:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rubenhero said:

Homework Statement


Assume all oscillators are frictionless.
a) A pendulum consists of point mass Mo swinging on a massless string of length Lo, with period To = 9.42 s on the surface of the Earth (at RE, the radius of the Earth). Find T1, the period of the same pendulum if it swings on a horizontal platform of height H = 2.96RE (stationary, not orbiting) above the Earth's surface.


Homework Equations


T = 2∏√(L/g) , g = GM/R2 , Radius of Earth = 6.37e6m, mass of Earth = 5.98e24kg


The Attempt at a Solution


g(T/2∏)2 = L
9.81m/s2√(9.42s/2∏)2 = 22.05012604m

g = GM/R2
(6.67e-11 * 5.98e24kg)/(2.96 * 6.37e6)2 = g1
3.98866e14/3.55518567e14 = 1.121927339m/s2 = g1

T1 = 2∏√(L/g1)
T1 = 2∏√(22.05012604/1.121927339)
T1 = 27.85499219s

The answer i calculated is wrong, any help with figuring out why it's wrong would be greatly appreciated:smile:

The R in the formula g = GM/R2 is the distance from the centre of the Earth.
This pendulum is set up 2.96RE above the surface, so 3.96RE from the centre.
 
Thank you for the response Peter. Are you saying that the R in the equation should be RE + 2.96RE?
 
rubenhero said:
Thank you for the response Peter. Are you saying that the R in the equation should be RE + 2.96RE?

I think yes. After you have worked it out, I will show you how I would have done the question - in a very simply way.
 
Ok so I redid the problem with the correction of the R. g = (6.67e-11 * 5.98e24kg)/((2.96*6.37e6)+6.37e6)2 and got a g = .626841558. Then T = 2∏√(22.05012604/.626841558) and got T = 37.26s. I think that period should be right, I'm interested in your alternate method to solving this type of problem:smile:
 
rubenhero said:
Ok so I redid the problem with the correction of the R. g = (6.67e-11 * 5.98e24kg)/((2.96*6.37e6)+6.37e6)2 and got a g = .626841558. Then T = 2∏√(22.05012604/.626841558) and got T = 37.26s. I think that period should be right, I'm interested in your alternate method to solving this type of problem:smile:

OK it amounts to using variation.

You already knew

T = 2∏√L/g and g = GM/R2

Substitute the expression for g into the first expression and we get

T = 2∏√(LR2/GM)

most of those terms don't change, so replacing 2∏√(L/GM) with something simple like k we get

T = kR

Now the new R value is 3.96 times the R value at the surface, so simple arithmetic →

T = 9.42 x 3.96 → 37.3072s or 37.3 s when respecting the significant figures in supplied data.

A couple of things to note:

1: This type of comparative approach is very powerful and leads to simple calculation.

2: Giving the distance above the Earth Surface is a common "tester" used in problems.
It is always fun to see people calculate that gravity 600km above the surface is way stronger than at the surface, because someone calculates with R = 600 000 m rather than 600 000 m MORE than the Radius of the Earth.

Another example:
Compare the centripetal acceleration of a satellite orbiting a distance RE above the surface of the earth, to one orbiting at a distance 2RE above the surface.

The centripetal acceleration is simple g at the point.

Knowing the formula g = GM/R2 leads some to assume an answer 4:1, but of course it is actually 9:4 since the R values to use in the formula are not RE & 2RE but 2RE & 3RE
 
rubenhero said:
Ok so I redid the problem with the correction of the R. g = (6.67e-11 * 5.98e24kg)/((2.96*6.37e6)+6.37e6)2 and got a g = .626841558. Then T = 2∏√(22.05012604/.626841558) and got T = 37.26s. I think that period should be right, I'm interested in your alternate method to solving this type of problem:smile:

Note: I think your answer of 37.26 varies from my 37.3026 due to the rounded off values of Earth mass and Radius you have used.

had you expressed your answer to 3 figures you would be giving the same answer as me.
 
Thank you for your help. I have a habit of not rounding, I'm glad my professor isn't too harsh about it. I found that your alternate way of doing this calculation to be much more efficient. I think the extra example you mentioned is cleverly worded and is very possible for my professor to put something similar on the next exam. I appreciate your time and patience spent helping me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K