Oscillation / Phase Space Question

union68
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Thornton and Marion, chapter 3, problem 21:

Use a computer to produces a phase space diagram similar to Figure 3-11 for the case of critical damping. Show analytically that the equation of the line that the phase paths approach asymptotically is \dot{x}=-\beta x. Show the phase paths for at least three initial positions above and below the line.

\beta>0 is the usual damping parameter.

Homework Equations



Equation of motion for critically damped oscillator:

x = A\exp \left(-\beta t\right) + Bt\exp \left(-\beta t\right).

And,

\dot{x} =-A\beta\exp\left(-\beta t \right) +B\exp\left(-\beta t \right)-B\beta t \exp\left(-\beta t \right).

The Attempt at a Solution



The phase diagram is done and correct. My problem is in showing the equation of the asymptote. My first inclination was to examine the limits of x and \dot{x} as t \to \infty. But they both go to zero, correct?

But I took at peak at the solution and they have

\lim_{t \to \infty} x = Bt\exp \left(-\beta t\right)

and

\lim_{t\to \infty} \dot{x} = -B\beta t \exp\left(-\beta t \right).

Therefore, \dot{x} = -\beta x as t \to \infty.

What?! Aren't those limits zero?! Am I so sleep deprived that I can't even take limits anymore? What am I doing wrong?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those limits are indeed zero, but the limit of x-dot divided by the limit of x is -beta. That's exactly what the question wanted you to prove.
 
Oh, OK. So you're taking the limit of the ratio \dot{x}/x. Why would be interested in that limit? I'm having a hard time finding motivation for all these things that the problems want you to do.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top