Oscillations Car carrying four people find how much body rises

AI Thread Summary
A 1175 kg car with four passengers weighing 80 kg each bounces on a rough dirt road with corrugations 4.0 m apart at a speed of 17 km/h. The natural frequency of the car's suspension was calculated to be 445.059 rad/s, and the spring constant was found to be 3.75e8 N/m. The attempt to calculate the rise in the car body due to the decrease in weight after the passengers exit resulted in an incorrect value of 1.8e-5 m. The error was identified as a unit conversion mistake when converting speed from km/h to m/s. Proper unit conversion is crucial for accurate calculations in physics problems.
GingerBread27
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
A 1175 kg car carrying four 80 kg people travels over a rough "washboard" dirt road with corrugations 4.0 m apart which causes the car to bounce on its spring suspension. The car bounces with maximum amplitude when its speed is 17 km/h. The car now stops, and the four people get out. By how much does the car body rise on its suspension owing to this decrease in weight?

I first tried figuring the natural frequency of the car:

\omega_o=(2\pi\upsilon)/(\Delta(x))=(2\pi(17km/h)(1hr/60s)/(.004km) This gives 445.059 rad/s.

I then tried to figure out k:

\kappa=(m1+m2)\omega_o^2=((1175 kg+(4*180kg))(445.059rad/s)^2 This gives 3.75e8.

Finally, I tried finding \Delta(x)=\Delta(F)/\kappa=(m_2*g)/(\kappa)=((180 kg*4)(9.8m/s^2))/(3.75*10^8)This gives 1.8e-5 m, or .00188 cm, this is wrong, where did I go wrong? Help!

PS This is the first time I use Latex so if it looks odd I'm sorry!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Help...Anyone lol...
 
your conversion for the first part seems to be off... recheck it... and make sure you convert to meter seconds... but you're on the right track
 
i just solved my homework problem with your equations and it worked. the only problem with your method is your unit conversions: to go from km/h to m/s you multiply by 1000/(60^2)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Back
Top