Oscillator driving frequencies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of graphs depicting oscillation amplitude in relation to external frequency. It highlights that while some graphs start at zero, others, particularly those with constant force amplitude, do not. At low frequencies, the amplitude of oscillations approaches F/k, explaining why it does not drop to zero as frequency decreases. The conversation also notes that different plotting methods can represent various physical situations, affecting how frequency is depicted. Ultimately, the nature of the force applied influences the graph's starting point.
Saado
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I've attached a graph to this post. Why is it that the periodic external frequency applied never starts at 0 on graphs like these?
 

Attachments

  • 1200px-Resonance.PNG
    1200px-Resonance.PNG
    31.9 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
It does start at 0 on the graph you posted.
##\omega_A## is the input frequency (or periodic external frequency). When ##\omega_A = 0##, the frequency ratio ##\omega_A\omega_0 = 0##.
 
Sorry my bad I meant the amplitude of the oscillations.
 
If the force has constant amplitude, at low frequencies the ##m\ddot x## term is small compared with the ##kx## term in the equation of motion, so the amplitude is approximately ##F/k##. That is why the amplitude doesn't go to 0 as the frequency goes to 0.

Note, these type of plots can be drawn in different ways, corresponding to different physical situations:

1. The force has constant amplitude, like your attachment
2. The force amplitude is proportional to the frequency
3. The force amplitude is proportional to the frequency squared (for example the unbalanced force on a rotating object)

You can also plot how the velocity, and acceleration of the system changes with frequency.

Most of those plots do go to 0 when the frequency is 0.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top