Oscillator with and without damping - Need help please

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an oscillator with natural frequency ω, consisting of a mass on a spring on a frictionless table for x<0 and a frictional surface with an effective damping constant K for x>0. The problem involves finding the frequency of the oscillator and the ratio of successive amplitudes, assuming under-damping (K<ω).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to analyze the problem in two parts based on the conditions of the table. There are questions about how to combine the equations of motion for each side of the table and concerns about reducing the problem to a single equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing uncertainty about how to approach the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider separate time intervals for x>0 and x<0, but there is no explicit consensus on a method or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention being under time constraints due to an upcoming class, which adds pressure to resolve the problem. There is a sense of frustration among some members regarding the complexity of the problem.

Fjolvar
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
An oscillator with natural frequency ω consists of a mass on a spring positioned on a horizontal table. The table is frictionless for x<0 but has friction for x>0 and an effective damping constant K on that side of the table. Find the frequency of this oscillator and the ratio of successive amplitudes. Assume K<ω (Under-damping).
Relevant equations
x=C*cos(ωt) [Eqn of motion w/o damping] when x<0
x=Ce-Kt cos(ωdt) [Under-damping eqn of motion] when x>0Well it seems there will be two parts of the problem for each side of the table, which means it will probably be one quantity plus another. Any help getting started on this problem would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It won't be simply the sum of the two. It will consist of alternate pieces of the graphs of the two. We must consider the time intervals in which x>0 & x<0 separately.
 
Any others? I don't really think I need to use the graph on this one.
 
I've been stuck on this problem for a few days. I just can't see how to reduce it to one equation..
 
Any ideas? Class will be starting relatively soon and I've still yet to figure this one out. Any help much appreciated.. thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
988
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K