Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on sharing the beauty of the Universe through photos, videos, and animations, emphasizing the aesthetic appeal of space alongside scientific information. Participants are encouraged to post clips and images that comply with mainstream scientific guidelines, avoiding fringe theories. Notable contributions include time-lapse videos from the ISS and clips related to NASA missions, such as the Dawn and New Horizons projects. The thread also highlights the emotional impact of experiencing the vastness of space through visual media. Overall, it celebrates the intersection of art and science in showcasing the wonders of the Universe.
  • #901
Here's my final version of the image I referenced above, in post #897:

g_cygni-St_1-2.jpg


This is still only at 20% scale. The just-visible horizontal line is a trail from an airplane; I'm surprised it survived the stacking algorithm. The whole mosaic is here (8% scale), and there's a second trail in the lower corner:

g_cygni-St_1-1.jpg


and a 1:1 crop of the Crescent nebula and plane trail :)

g_cygni-St_1-3.jpg


g_cygni-St_1-4.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Spinnor, Fervent Freyja, collinsmark and 4 others
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #902
Drakkith said:
Well, I just bit the bullet and bought an Atik One 9.0 to replace my nearly twenty-year-old SBIG ST-2000XM.

It's here! It's here! Someone make the clouds go away!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Borg and DennisN
  • #903
...and it's broken. The filter wheel motor spins continuously and doesn't respond to commands.
Yay...
 
  • Sad
Likes Borg, davenn and Keith_McClary
  • #905
This just in, man calls tech support, finds spring inside camera body, puts spring in right place, has working camera now!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Andy Resnick, DennisN, Borg and 2 others
  • #906
Some (re)assembly required...
 
  • #907
chemisttree said:
Some (re)assembly required...

The tech support guy that I was emailing back and forth with said he had never in all his years making these cameras seen this happen before.

Tonight's supposed to be clear, so wish me luck for first light!
 
  • Like
Likes chemisttree, davenn and collinsmark
  • #908
I did some testing with bias and dark frames yesterday and today while waiting for clear skies.
Everything is looking good!

Read Noise: 3.5 e-
Dark Current: 0.001 e-/p/s at -10c. A 600s exposure accumulated just over half an electron of dark current on average across the sensor!
Bias frames look pretty clean. Much cleaner than my ST-2000.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #909
Wow. WOW. I can't believe the difference between my old camera and my new camera. Attached are two images of M16. Both are 300s subs with virtually identical pixel sizes and have been imaged using the exact same telescope. No calibration or processing has been done except to adjust the white and black points.

Old Camera: SBIG ST-2000XM
Screenshot 2020-09-04 21.57.13.png


New Camera: Atik One 9.0
Screenshot 2020-09-04 21.57.07.png


The difference in faint detail is stunning. You can easily see the complex dust lanes near the center of the nebula in the second image, unlike the first. I can't wait to get a few hours of subs to see what they look like stacked!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes DennisN, JCMacaw, Andy Resnick and 5 others
  • #910
Drakkith said:
I can't believe the difference between my old camera and my new camera.
Just WOW, very cool
congrats on the very worthwhile upgrade :partytime:
 
  • #911
18x300s (1.5 hrs) of HA data from tonight.
Image has been calibrated and histogram stretched.
m16-5min-ha-test.png
 
  • Love
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes DennisN, Spinnor, chemisttree and 4 others
  • #912
That is a spectacular photo. If you don't mind a totally naive question, how many pixels are there horizontally and vertically, and how many grayscale levels?
 
  • #913
sandy stone said:
naive question
And are there differences in the cameras' specs that account for the improvement (I haven't tried to lookitup)?
 
  • #914
sandy stone said:
That is a spectacular photo. If you don't mind a totally naive question, how many pixels are there horizontally and vertically, and how many grayscale levels?

Resolution is 1688 x 1350, but the camera has been binned 2x2, meaning that the maximum resolution I could get is roughly twice that. The sensor has a 3380 x 2704 native resolution. It's a 16 bit camera, so the grayscale runs from 0 to 65,535.

Keith_McClary said:
And are there differences in the cameras' specs that account for the improvement (I haven't tried to lookitup)?

The improvements between the images I posted above? Absolutely. For starters, the manufacturers given sensitivity for the new camera is just over twice what my old camera has (in the hydrogen alpha wavelength), but my own rough measurements were placing it possibly somewhere closer to 3x. The new camera also has less readout noise and much less dark current.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes chemisttree, sandy stone, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #915
It's Mars season! This image was captured from my back patio last Saturday night, before most of the fires, back when the sky was normal. Mars was in conjunction with the gibbous Moon that night, but as you can see, that wasn't a problem.

Mars will reach its closest approach to Earth on October 6, and will be at opposition on October 13. I hope to post a few more images from now through that time, weather, seeing conditions, fires, and unforeseen yet impending apocalypses allowing.

Acquisition details below.

2020-09-06 1119_4 rgb-compose-RGB.jpg

Midpoint time-stamp: 2020-09-06 11:19.4 UT

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF telescope mounted on an equatorial wedge
TeleVue 2x Powermate to bring optical system to f/20, focal length 5000 mm
ZWO Electronic Filter Wheel with Astromomik Deep Sky RGB filter set
ZWO ASI290MM monochrome camera
(Note: Mars was high enough in the sky such that an atmospheric dispersion corrector was not needed or used)

FireCapture software was used to take a series of nine, 2 minute videos at about 111 frames per second, alternating between the red, green, and blue filters for each run (RGBRGBRGB). Re-focusing was done between runs. A total of 8 runs were performed, but not all runs had good seeing conditions. And, due to laziness, on more than one occasion, Mars drifted into the edge of the frame because I stepped away from my laptop instead of babysitting the capture (I really aught to update the LX200-ACF's PEC calibration). As a matter of fact, there really wasn't any run that was quite suitable for WinJUPOS de-rotation, so I didn't bother. But there was one run where there was pretty sharp seeing conditions in a contiguous RGB set (in this case, run 6, XXXXXBRGX). So I just used those without bothering with de-rotation.

Autostackkert! was used for stacking. As usual, 50% of frames were stacked as part of the "Lucky Imaging."

Registax was used for its wavelet sharpening.

Finally, Gimp was used for combining the RGB channels, color/contrast adjustments and cropping.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, Drakkith, davenn and 3 others
  • #916
Hello, I added JUpiter images from yesterday with mobile phone adapter (Huawei 11) using yellow filter 8 (but not sure if through mobile camera filter effect working good..) +I have some problem with sharpening..
Your Mars is great ... I looked on Mars yesterday as well and I thing that filter 8 highlights grey areas...

Lot of succes :smile: :thumbup:
 

Attachments

  • J6G.jpg
    J6G.jpg
    3.8 KB · Views: 157
  • J10G.jpg
    J10G.jpg
    3.8 KB · Views: 141
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #917
Hello, it is Altair by Bresser eyepiece camera.
:smile:
 

Attachments

  • 0051.jpg
    0051.jpg
    2.1 KB · Views: 144
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #918
collinsmark said:
It's Mars season! This image was captured from my back patio last Saturday night, before most of the fires, back when the sky was normal. Mars was in conjunction with the gibbous Moon that night, but as you can see, that wasn't a problem.
Beautiful! Congratulations! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #919
Here's this week's Mars image (as we await closest approach on Oct. 6, opposition on Oct. 13). This image was captured from my back patio on the night of 2020, Sept. 18th.

The South Polar Cap can be seen at the bottom.

The dark band spanning from left center to right center is is called the Mare Cimmerium starting at the left side, becoming the Mare Sirenum at the right side.

Olympus Mons, the largest volcano in our solar system, is visible at the upper right, near the edge. If, in the image, you start at the very right side at the equator, and then follow the edge North to about 20 deg. N latitude, you can make out a little dimple near the edge. That dimple is Olympus Mons.

The weird halo-like effect along the left and bottom edge is not a feature of the planet itself, but rather is primarily caused by diffraction in my telescope, exacerbated a little by some sharpening I did in post processing. There's some interesting physics going on there, if you like diffraction theory. I'm pushing my telescope's magnification to its limits here. The only real, reliable way to reduce the effect without sacrificing focus is to get a bigger telescope, or to wait until other conditions cause the boundary between Mars and space to appear less abruptly.

Acquisition and processing details below.

2020-09-19-1021_3 Mars-rgb-compose-RGB.jpg

Midpoint timestamp: 2020-09-19 10:21.3 UT

Equipment:
Meade LX200-ACF 10", fork mounted on an equatorial wedge.
Tele Vue 4x Powermate (this is the item's first light, btw) to bring optical system to f/40, focal length of 10,000 mm. Sweet, fancy Moses. That's 10 meters. Ten. Meters. Good lordy.
ZWO EFW electronic filter wheel.
Astronomik Deep Sky RGB filter set.
ZWO ASI290MM monochrome camera.

The reason I chose the 4x Powermate instead of the 2x Powermate was not to increase resolution -- I'm already past the diffraction limitations of my optics given the camera's pixel size, even with the 2x PowerMate. Rather my goal with the 4x Powermate was to use my camera's internal 2x2 software binning feature to quadruple the full sensor frame rate over the USB, making it comparable to the 2x Powermate with a smaller region of interest (ROI), all while effectively doubling the signal to noise ratio (SNR). Unfortunately, FireCapture, the acquisition software that I'm using, doesn't seem to recognize the camera's internal 2x2 binning feature (FireCapture can do 2x2 software binning after the data transfer, but that defeats the point entirely). So, in the end, I skipped any 2x2 binning altogether and decided to just work with the larger image of Mars since I had it, faster framerate and beter SNR be damned.

Acquisition and processing:
Red: Exposure = 10.4 ms, Gain = 331, Framerate = 96 fps
Green: Exposure = 10.4 ms, Gain = 387, Framerate = 96 fps
Blue: Exposure = 9.6 ms, Gain 439, Framerate = 104 fps
Approximately 12,000 frames captured, per 2 minute video, per color.
Nine videos were stacked using Lucky Imaging process (18 minutes of integration time).

FireCapture was used to take data in the form of a series of 2-minute uncompressed video (.SER files), alternating between red, green, and blue filters for 9 videos per set (RGBRGBRGB, 18 minutes of capture time per set). Refocusing was performed between sets. Nine sets were captured but not all were used. (Btw, on a side note, I filled up an entire terabyte [that's 1000 GB] on my hard drive that night. Jaysus.)

Autostackkert! was used to evaluate and process each video into an image. The sharpest data came at the end of one set and the beginning of the next (specifically, Set6:xxxRGBRGB and Set7:RGBxxxxxx) -- but still, three contiguous groups of RGB data. That data was kept.

Registax wavelet sharping was used individually for each of the 9 images.

WinJUPOS was used to derotate and combine each of the color channels individually (beginning with 3 images for Red, 3, images for Green, and 3 images for Blue), producing a combined Red image, a combined Blue image, and a combined Green image.

Gimp's healing brush was used to repair derotation artifacts. Gimp was also used to combine the Red, Green, and Blue images into their respective color channels (i.e., combine into a single, color image), and finally to perform some color curves adjustments, saturation adjustments and contrast adjustments.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, chemisttree and Drakkith
  • #920
Completed mosaic of the North American Nebula, pretty happy with the results:

North_American_Nebula-mod-St_filtered copy-3.jpg


The original is approximately 10k x 10k pixels, so I should be able to print this 4' x 4'. Printing at "display resolution" would be 8' x 8', for comparison. In the end, I decided to leave in all (about 20) the airplane tracks, I think they add an element of interest.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Keith_McClary, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #921
Andy Resnick said:
Completed mosaic of the North American Nebula, pretty happy with the results:
Amazing and very nice colors! How many photos is it stitched from approximately?
(disregarding number of stacked photos, if you used stacking)
 
  • #922
collinsmark said:
I'm pushing my telescope's magnification to its limits here. The only real, reliable way to reduce the effect without sacrificing focus is to get a bigger telescope, or to wait until other conditions cause the boundary between Mars and space to appear less abruptly.
Hubble Space Telescope, beware of @collinsmark , he's on a roll now! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Keith_McClary
  • #923
DennisN said:
Amazing and very nice colors! How many photos is it stitched from approximately?
(disregarding number of stacked photos, if you used stacking)

Thanks! All in all, I mosaic'ed together 15 stacks taken during the past 2 years; each stack consists of about 200 images.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and DennisN
  • #924
Hello, Mars by mobile phone Huawei Y6 (Hyperion 8mm) . I have always problem with sharpening , not sure
if image colour shape can reflect real situation... have nice nights.. :smile: :thumbup:
 

Attachments

  • M1.jpg
    M1.jpg
    4.8 KB · Views: 145
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, chemisttree and DennisN
  • #925
bruha said:
Hello, Mars by mobile phone Huawei Y6
Better then what I have managed to do with Mars. I got so much abberation that it looked like three planets with different colors. :smile: (yes, really, I'm not joking)
 
  • #926
O, thanks, ... I am sorry about it, which gear you use?
 
  • #927
Hi here is still one Mars image . This is with filter yellow 8 and seems to me more real collours comparing
original Mars image but... :frown: o_O
 

Attachments

  • mc4.jpg
    mc4.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 156
  • Marsoriginal.jpg
    Marsoriginal.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 157
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Quarkman1
  • #928
This one is a favorite of mine, the star Eta Carinae and the Homunculus Nebula. When this star goes (if it hasn't already) the show is going to be spectacular!
Homunculus.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, chemisttree and collinsmark
  • #929
Hi this is Jupiter image by sony compact small camera, I think by phone camera it is better... :frown: :smile:
 

Attachments

  • J4.JPG
    J4.JPG
    5.4 KB · Views: 160
  • Like
Likes DennisN, collinsmark and Quarkman1
  • #930
Andromeda galaxy (M31) just barely fits in a 35mm format frame using an 800mm lens- 5 hr observation time @ ISO640:

800_mm-21457s-2.jpg


Previously, I imaged this at 400mm for two reasons, one good (faster lens = easier to image) and one bad (stacking software limitation). With DSS, I could only get really good background subtraction in the central region of the field. Now, with APP, I can iteratively correct across the full frame.

In terms of 'resolution', even though the point spread function increases when I convert a f/2.8 lens to a f/5.6, the increase is more than compensated for by the increase in magnification- 2X magnification beats a 1.6X increase in PSF (2.5 pixels to 4). Here's a 1:1 crop:

800_mm-21457s-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Hamiltonian, davenn, DennisN and 4 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K