Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on sharing the beauty of the Universe through photos, videos, and animations, emphasizing the aesthetic appeal of space alongside scientific information. Participants are encouraged to post clips and images that comply with mainstream scientific guidelines, avoiding fringe theories. Notable contributions include time-lapse videos from the ISS and clips related to NASA missions, such as the Dawn and New Horizons projects. The thread also highlights the emotional impact of experiencing the vastness of space through visual media. Overall, it celebrates the intersection of art and science in showcasing the wonders of the Universe.
  • #1,401
There’s actually 2 3 4 geostationary or geosynchronous satellites inside the 3rd circle (lower, right), for a total of 4 5 6.

5a39fe3e-587d-4699-826b-e7f2e2c70d72-jpeg.jpg


https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-0939-gif.147805/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #1,402
does anyone have a clue what this object is? I highlighted 2 objects with short white lines above the objects. The one on the left side I believe is a geostationary/geosynchronous satellite, the one on the right is dimmer, more diffuse, takes up a larger area, not traveling parallel to the geostationary satellite, seems to be moving a little quicker... these are 30 second exposures.

IMG-0939-2.gif
 
  • #1,403
Welp. This turned out better than expected. Taken Friday night from my back patio. Jupiter is at opposition this week (the peak of opposition is August 19-20th), so now's a pretty good time to get out and see it. Acquisition and processing details below.

2021-08-14-0720_3-Combined-RGB_Registax.jpg

Figure 1. Jupiter

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF (telescope)
Tele Vue 4x Powermate (basically a 4x Barlow lens)
ZWO Atmospheric Dispersion Corrector (ADC)
ZWO filter wheel with Astronomik RGB filter set
ZWO ASI290MM (monochrome camera)

Software:
FireCapture
Autostakkert!
Registax
WinJUPOS
Gimp

Midpoint timestamp: 2021-08-14 07:20.3 UT
Total integration time: 9 minutes, 50% of frames kept, no normalization.

So, this image was taken on Friday night, but it really started by my throwing away all the data taken Thursday night, which was garbage due to inadequate dew management. About a terabyte of data down the drain. "I don't need a dew shield," I had said, "I've got my active dew heater strap going. That should be enough," I told myself. "I'll be fine." I was an idiot.

So anyway, back to Friday night. This time I set up with proper dew prevention (Fig. 2).
TelescopeWithDewShieldSmall.jpg

Figure 2. Telescope

Using FireCapture software, I took several sequences of alternating Red, Blue, and Green filters, 1 minute videos per filter, 18 minute sequences. In other words, I would capture RGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGB, where each letter corresponds to a 1 minute, uncompressed video. I only planned on processing 9 minutes of video data, but these 18 minute sequences give me some flexibility to choose the best 9 minute window within any given sequence. In-between sequences I re-leveled the ADC and refocused. Five sequences were taken. About 2/3 of a terabyte of Jupiter data was captured that night.

By a stroke of luck, the best seeing for the evening occurred somewhat early (before Jupiter crossed the meridian), when the Great Red Spot (GRS) was visible. I'll take that!

All the videos were processed using Autostakkert! software, keeping 50% of frames, no normalization.

I should note that Autostakkert! gives the option to output an additional, sharpened image, with a "conv" in the filename, in addition to the regular, unsharpened image. Regardless of what Dylan O'Donnell might suggest for his workflow (), I don't suggest using the "conv" images in your subsequent processing; they are only a quick-and-dirty sharpening meant for evaluation purposes. Wavelet sharpening such as Registax does a much better job. That said, the Autostakkert! produced "conv" images are a great at helping you choose which outputs to keep and move forward with, and which outputs to throw away. My point is once you decide which files you want to keep (and by all means use the "conv" images to help you choose), don't use the "conv" images for further processing; use the unsharpened images moving forward.

So anyway, after evaluating all the processed data, I chose a 9-minute window in my third sequence, centered around 07:20.3 UT, for further processing. This window includes 3 images with the Red filter, 3 with the Green filter, and three with the Blue filter, alternating RGBRGBRGB.

I then individually sharpened the images using Registax wavelet sharpening, keeping the same settings for each of the three images of a given color filter, although the settings were different for different color filters. (To be clear, all the images are still black-and-white at this point, it's just that 3 images were taken with the Red filter, three with the Green filter, and three with the Blue). I was fairly aggressive on the sharpening in this step, knowing that the noise would be reduced a little bit in the upcoming WinJUPOS derotation combination step.

You may be asking, "why did you start with nine, 1 minute videos instead of three, 3 minute videos?" That's because Jupiter rotates really fast; it's day only about 10 hours. Any video over about a minute or so will begin to blur when processed due to Jupiter's rotation.

Once you have sharpened images you can use WinJUPOS to combine even a few more images together using WinJUPOS's "De-rotation of Images" tool. This tool warps indivdual images in a way that mimics Jupiter's rotation, and then combines them together into a single image, synchronized to the target timestamp.

By the way, recall that I used FireCapture to initially capture the raw data in the form of uncompressed videos. Firecapture has a setting that automatically puts the midpoint timestamp of each video in the filename, as part of the WinJUPOS file naming convention. I keep this same filename convention all through the processing (all through Autostakkert!, Registax, etc.) That makes it really easy to keep track of exact time the videos were taken, and WinJUPOS automatically sets up the time by reading the images' filenames. So using the WinJUPOS naming convension of all your files makes the workflow really easy. And again, it all starts with checking a single checkbox in FireCapture's filename settings.

If you're new to WinJUPOS, there is a bit of a learning curve, but then it's really easy to work with once you get the hang of it.

So at this point in the process, I now have three monochrome images, one taken with the Red Filter, one with the Green, and one with the Blue. I then used WinJUPOS's "De-rotation of R/G/B frames" tool to combine the three images into a single, color image. Note that I didn't really do any de-rotation in this step, since all the de-rotation was done in the previous step. But I did use this WinJUPOS tool to combine the three images into a single, color image.

In images submitted in my previous posts I used Gimp combine the three channels into a single, color image, but this time I used WinJUPOS. I think the team at WinJUPOS might have made some improvements in this area since last year, because it worked great this time.

Then I went back into Registax for a second time, and gave the color image one final round of wavelet sharpening.

To end the processing, I used Gimp for final adjustments (color curves, contrast, saturation, etc.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes chemisttree, davenn, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #1,404
I think I figured out which satellites those actually are. I was shooting near Shingletown, CA at about 11:09pm on 7/28/21.

I suspect some of the satellites are:

-AT&T T-16 (Norad 44333)
NSF-2019-06-20-13-55-25-274.jpg


-SES-11 Echostar 105 (Norad 42967)
-11_manufactured_by_airbus-_photo_credit_airbus_ds.jpg


-Galaxy 30 (Norad 46114)
galaxy-30__1.jpg


-USA 134 (Norad 25019)
[classified payload]

-USA 227 (Norad 37377)
[classified payload]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,405
I took this shot back on 7/28/21 along with the Milky Way photo. I didn't post it at the time because it didn't turn out nearly as good as I was hoping, but it's still interesting enough to post.

Some of the reasons it didn't turn out well...
-I waited until it was right next to the horizon because I was shooting the milky way earlier
-I under exposed the raw frames
-Since it was so poor anyway I didn't bother stacking or using the darks and flats I captured

Antares Nebula
300mm, f/4.5, 60 sec, 800iso, single shot, full frame sensor, moonless bortle 2, shasta county, northern california, usa

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-0955-jpg.148487/

https://www.speakev.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,onerror=redirect,width=1920,height=1920,fit=scale-down/https://www.speakev.com/attachments/5596149-jpeg.148488/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,406
collinsmark said:
Figure 1. Jupiter
Magnificient! That's probably the best "amateur" photo I've seen of the planet!
Congratulations! :partytime:

Edit: Maybe you could consider suggesting it to APOD?

collinsmark said:
About a terabyte of data down the drain. "I don't need a dew shield," I had said, "I've got my active dew heater strap going. That should be enough," I told myself. "I'll be fine." I was an idiot.
:biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,407
614AAF24-BEAC-45D6-9E53-0E9B2233299B.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,408
Hello, I attach two Jupiter images (low and higher exp) and three Saturn images (one without and two with blue filter). SV Ebony eyepiece camera on Skywatcher telescope 1000 x 200 mm. o_O :smile:
 

Attachments

  • Capture_00093G.jpg
    Capture_00093G.jpg
    2 KB · Views: 134
  • Capture_00106GA.jpg
    Capture_00106GA.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 137
  • Capture_00017G2.jpg
    Capture_00017G2.jpg
    2.9 KB · Views: 149
  • Capture_00061G.jpg
    Capture_00061G.jpg
    2.1 KB · Views: 123
  • Capture_00078G.jpg
    Capture_00078G.jpg
    3.6 KB · Views: 146
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,409
wildfire smoke… it’s been impairing my observing conditions… the new normal is driving around with a portable air filter…

60270E67-FE4A-4419-B27D-58B730137E33.jpeg
https://www.speakev.com/attachments/smoke-gif.148647/
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary and DennisN
  • #1,410
This is my most ambitious astrophotography project thus far: a time-lapse video of Jupiter.



Processing was essentially the same as most of my last posts, except this time, the back-end parts such as the WinJUPOS derotation, instead of being done just once, I had to do it hundreds of times. I do think the end result is worth the effort, but it did take a lot of effort. If you're looking to do this sort of thing yourself, make sure you enter into it with a lot of patience and free time. To be frank: it took a lot of work.

Also, YouTube's compression algorithm took a toll. Here's a frame from the video before sending it to YouTube, for comparison:

2021-08-16-0823_0-R-RGB-SharpenAI-softness.jpg


Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF (telescope)
Tele Vue 4x Powermate (basically, a Barlow lens)
ZWO Atmospheric Dispersion Corrector (ADC)
ZWO filter wheel
Astronomik RGB filter set
ZWO ASI290MM (camera)

Software:
FireCapture
AutoStakkert!
RegiStax
WinJUPOS
GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP)
Topaz Sharpen AI GarageBand (for the music)
CyberLink PowerDirector (to combine images into video format)

Acquisition and processing details:

Atmospheric seeing conditions were quite good that night, not necessarily excellent, but at least pretty darned good.

Exposure time was adjusted in FireCapture to keep the frame rate as reasonably high as possible, and the camera gain was adjusted to keep the right-most side of the histogram curve between 1/2 to 1/3 below saturation. 781 GB of raw data taken between 07:28 and 09:53, 2021-08-16 UT, in the form of 1 minute long SER video files, alternating between physical Red, Green, and Blue filters (438 files total, 146 for each color filter). About every ~18 minutes, I re-leveled the ADC and checked focus.

AutoStakkert! was used to process each SER file, producing a TIFF image file for each. 50% of frames were stacked, no normalization.

RegiStax wavelet sharpening was used on each TIFF file, to produce sharpened images.

WinJUPOS "De-rotation of images..." tool was used to produce frames for each 30 second real-time interval (from 07:28 to 09:53 timestamps) based on the nearest 3 (sometimes 4) images from the previous step, for a smooth progression, maintaining continuity. This was done separately for each of the physical Red, Green, and Blue filter sets of images.

WinJUPOS "De-rotation of R/G/B frames..." tool was used to combine the images in the previous step into color images. No actual "de-rotation" was done in this step, since that was done in the previous step, however, the tool was used to combine the three sets of monochrome images into a single set of RGB color imges.

Used python scripts (plugins) in GIMP to adjust contrast and saturation of all images from the last step. (I had to write the saturation one myself. Fortunately, I found the contrast one online, and used that as a reference.)

Topaz Sharpen AI was used for a final sharpening/denoise step. At this point, there were 291 color images, each corresponding to a real-time 30 second interval, ready for the video (9.7 seconds of video at 30 fps).

Threw together some music in GarageBand.

CyberLink PowerDirector (plus some text and stuff produced in GIMP) was used to make the video out of all of that.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
  • Like
Likes davenn, Andy Resnick, Devin-M and 2 others
  • #1,411
collinsmark said:
This is my most ambitious astrophotography project thus far: a time-lapse video of Jupiter.
Stunning and impressive! Congratulations again!
:partytime:
collinsmark said:
I do think the end result is worth the effort, but it did take a lot of effort. If you're looking to do this sort of thing yourself, make sure you enter into it with a lot of patience and free time. To be frank: it took a lot of work.
I can imagine!
I think I've posted a similar project a couple of people did with Jupiter quite some time ago, but I can't find the post at the moment.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,412
I got a link from a friend to this site with cool gear for mobile astrophotography: :smile: TrailerDomes.

TrailerDomes-ObservationMode.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes berkeman, Keith_McClary, Borg and 2 others
  • #1,413
Hello, I send two Jupiter images from yesterday, this time with mobile camera {Huawei Y6} adapted to eyepiece 8 mm {telescope skywatcher 600 x 200mm].:smile::wideeyed::wideeyed:
 

Attachments

  • Jupiter 3.gif
    Jupiter 3.gif
    3 KB · Views: 144
  • Jupiter 4.gif
    Jupiter 4.gif
    3.7 KB · Views: 132
  • Like
Likes chemisttree, collinsmark, davenn and 2 others
  • #1,414
14mm, f/2.8, 400iso, 120sec, full frame sensor, moonless bortle 2, shasta county, california, usa

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-3033-gif.149501/
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes BvU, collinsmark, Ibix and 3 others
  • #1,415
Hello, I send three Saturn images again made with mobile camera {Huawei Y6} adapted to eyepiece 8 mm {telescope skywatcher 600 x 200mm] and little GIMP corrected. :wideeyed: :smile:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210904_225926G.jpg
    IMG_20210904_225926G.jpg
    1.8 KB · Views: 118
  • IMG_20210904_225926G2.jpg
    IMG_20210904_225926G2.jpg
    1.8 KB · Views: 121
  • IMG_20210904_225926G.jpg
    IMG_20210904_225926G.jpg
    1.8 KB · Views: 140
  • Like
Likes chemisttree, collinsmark, davenn and 1 other person
  • #1,416
in my last image I'm seeing what appears to be a cloud of dust drifting away to the left from a meteor entry... upper middle frame...
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,417
still saturn -these two are better.. I hope :smile: :wideeyed:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210904_230137GGG.jpg
    IMG_20210904_230137GGG.jpg
    1.8 KB · Views: 142
  • IMG_20210904_230137GGGG.jpg
    IMG_20210904_230137GGGG.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 134
  • Like
Likes chemisttree, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,418
One of the panoramas I have been working on within the Cygnus constellation- this one is in the neighborhood of γ Cygni, centered on the Crescent nebula (NGC 6888), using my 400/2.8 lens:

g_Cygni-St-74143s copy.jpg

Everything (stacking, corrections, mosaic assembly) was done in Astro Pixel Processor, the original is 13781 x 15138 pixels.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, Borg, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #1,419
bruha said:
still saturn -these two are better.. I hope
Many of your latest photos of Saturn look very sharp and nice to me. Are you taking multiple photos and then stacking them in a stacking software?

Maybe you already know this, but I want to say there's also the possibility to film a planet, and then produce a photo by stacking the frames of the film automatically. When I was using my mobile phone, I got better results when filming than taking photos (perhaps because there were more frames to stack in the films). When I did this I selected the maximum resolution and maximium fps (frames/second) possible for recording video in the app OpenCamera.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,420
So here’s a closeup of what I think is a meteor entry turning into a visible cloud of dust… each frame is 2 minutes so this spans about 10 minutes… can anyone think of a different explanation? spaceship coming out of hyperdrive?https://www.speakev.com/attachments/c182a72b-7379-43df-8720-52e7cc88887c-gif.149567/
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,421
Hello, thank you
my images are just simple single photos- last two are made by PRO mode of standard camera within Huawei mobile. (adjusting just ISO and exp. time) and little sharpening and denoising in GIMP.
But thank you for advice, next time I will try this procedure. :thumbup: :smile: :smile:
Thanks and lot of succes
 
  • #1,422
Hallo, can I ask how you generate photo sequence from the recorded film {with Open Camera] as you mentioned ?
Thank you :smile:
 
  • #1,423
bruha said:
Hallo, can I ask how you generate photo sequence from the recorded film {with Open Camera] as you mentioned ?
For that I use a software called PIPP (Planetary Imaging Preprocessor). Downloadable here.

Stacking:

For stacking I currently use AutoStakkert. Downloadable here.

If you haven't stacked images before, here's a very brief guide for using AutoStakkert:
https://www.astrokraai.nl/tut/guide_dennis_put.htm

There are more guides available here: https://www.autostakkert.com/wp/guides/

AutoStakkert can also take a movie clip directly and stack it. I currently don't remember exactly which video formats it supports (e.g. mp4 etc), so when doing this it's a good idea to check that the camera is recording in a suitable video format.

Good luck! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,424
Thank you very much and good luck you to :smile:
 
  • #1,426
Keith_McClary said:
Would that have been in sunlight?
altitude of between about 80 to 120 km
I'm not sure it would be in sunlight, it was about 11:21pm on 9/5/21 in Shasta County, California, USA

Here it is processed at a bit higher resolution... This is 6 frames so spans 12 minutes.

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-3077-gif.149668/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,427
Here's the other panorama in Cygnus I've been assembling, this one of the North America Nebula and surroundings:

North_America_Nebula-mod-St-46475s copy.jpg


This is nearly a 2 x 2 mosaic using a 400/2.8 lens (full frame), original size is 9334 x 8985 pixels, all stacking and post-processing done in Astro Pixel Processor.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,428
Devin-M said:
I'm not sure it would be in sunlight, it was about 11:21pm on 9/5/21 in Shasta County, California, USA

Here it is processed at a bit higher resolution... This is 6 frames so spans 12 minutes.

<snip video>
I'd be interested in seeing what the 'difference image' video would look like. By 'difference images', I mean post-processing the video file so that each frame (say frame 'i') is the difference between frame 'i' and frame 'i-1'. It's a quick and easy way to get rid of static features and emphasize changes that occur from one frame to the next.
 
  • #1,429
Andy Resnick said:
I'd be interested in seeing what the 'difference image' video would look like. By 'difference images', I mean post-processing the video file so that each frame (say frame 'i') is the difference between frame 'i' and frame 'i-1'. It's a quick and easy way to get rid of static features and emphasize changes that occur from one frame to the next.
Here you go:
https://www.speakev.com/attachments/1-gif.149732/
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, Andy Resnick, bruha and 3 others
  • #1,430
I’m not sure whether I’m seeing infrared light activating the red pixels directly from the hot dust and gas or light pollution from the ground reflecting off the dust or perhaps a combination of both…?
 
  • #1,431
The Helix Nebula (NGC 7293) is a planetary nebula (nothing really to do with planets though) some 650 light-years away, in the constellation Aquarius. It's composed of the remnants of a dying star that was once quite like our Sun.

Captured between 2021-08-27 and 2021-09-13.
Total Integration time: 7.81 hours

HelixNebula2021.jpg


This is the first deep-sky object I've imaged in around 11 years. Technology has sure changed. I'm getting used to some new software and new equipment (well, new to me anyway). Plenty of mistakes were made, and plenty of lessons learned.

The Helix Nebula presents several challenges for me. I live in very light polluted skies (Bortle Class 8), and the Helix Nebula is not particularly bright, even though it is considered a "bright," planetary nebula.

From my vantage point, when not blocked by obstacles, it is fairly low to the horizon in the South-Southwest [in the direction of Mordor]. That's right where there's a ton of glare from neighborhood lights and also the same direction as the city skyglow [and let's not forget about evil forces and fiery Mt. Doom in Mordor]. Even with a telescope and an appropriate eyepiece, I probably couldn't even see it visually without of a long exposure camera [unless of course I slipped on the precious and entered the wraith-world, but that brings about its own issues].

In addition to the light-pollution, I also faced a broken-record's worth of coastal eddies that boosted the marine layer (resulting in clouds and haze); smoke from regional fires (I'm not even making that one up); [a gang of orcs]; guiding problems; the frustration of switching mid-project from a cheap guide-scope to an off-axis guider (OAG); [a nazgûl, but fortunately just the one (1 out of 9 max)]; tracking errors (oh, god the tracking errors -- my scope's gears could use a tune-up); A freak downpour that's practically unheard of in San Diego, California [or Hobbiton, The Shire], and some software compatibility weirdness.

------- Acquisition and processing details -------------

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF (telescope)
Optec Lepus 0.62 Telecompressor
Astronomik RGB filters
Astronomik narrowband filters (SII, Hα, Oiii)
ZWO ASI1600MM (camera)
(various guiding equipment, not mentioned here.)

Software:
Nightime Imaging 'N' Astronomy (N.I.N.A.)
PixInsight
Topaz Denoise AI
Gnu Imaging Manipulation Program (GIMP)

Something of note is the flat frames were taken using a couple of white T-shirts (undershirts), a 14" embroidery ring, and a cheap, portable artists' "light box" used for sketching/tracing. The neat thing about that is the most expensive part was the bag of T-shirts.

The breakdown of filter integration is as follows (this only includes the "good" subframes, which were only about 50% of the total):
SII: 2.64 hours
Hα: 1.82 hours
Oiii: 1.58 hours
R: 0.56 hours
G: 0.56 hours
B: 0.65 hours
If you're wondering why there's so much more SII instead of Hα or Oiii, it's because the SII night was the about the only night the weather was cooperating.

Most of the processing was done in PixInsight. I'm brand new to PixInsight, so I'll spare you the details, since my workflow was all over the place. Suffice it to say, after calibrating, integrating, stretching and some color corrections, the color channels were combined using the PixelMath process in the following way:
Red Channel: 0.2R + 0.8Hα
Green Channel: 0.2G + 0.8Oiii
Blue Channel: 0.2B + 0.8SII

I think it came out okay, all things considered. But I look forward to improvements when I revisit the Helix Nebula in the coming years. [And I think all-in-all, the Dark Lord Sauron would be pleased.]
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Andy Resnick, DennisN, Bystander and 2 others
  • #1,432
That’s a very very nice acquisition and worth a poster-print. I just got my first large size astro-print mounted on the wall yesterday…

248F8383-0652-4E06-A624-38940F927C23.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Keith_McClary and collinsmark
  • #1,433
I did some saturn imaging last night with a 300mm f/4.5 nikon lens + tc-301 nikon 2x teleconverter for effective 600mm f/9 with 1000iso and 1/160th second exposures on a nikon d800 full frame sensor dslr, no tracking, exposures 7 seconds apart..

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/dsc_3510-2-gif.150133/

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/dsc_3510-gif.150134/

20 images stacked and enlarged via interpolation:

saturn_stacked.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes chemisttree and Keith_McClary
  • #1,434
this is what I get after converting just the green channel to monochrome with 20 stacked 16-bit tifs (600mm f/9 1/160th sec 1000iso):

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/saturn_stacked_mono_green2-gif.150147/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DennisN and Keith_McClary
  • #1,435
Hello, it is very nice, :thumbup: :thumbup: which software you use for green channel converting?
Thank you :smile:
 
  • #1,436
bruha said:
Hello, it is very nice, :thumbup: :thumbup: which software you use for green channel converting?
Thank you :smile:

First I histogram stretched and cropped 20 RAW image files in Adobe Lightroom and exported them to 16-bit TIF files. Next I stacked them in Lynkeos to a 16-bit TIF. Then in Adobe Photoshop I copied the green channel and pasted it into the red and blue channels. Then back in Adobe Lightroom I did some final histogram stretching to the 16 bit TIF. Then back in Adobe Photoshop I did some final cropping and upscaled the image with interpolation before finally exporting as a GIF file. This was the camera I used but the tracking mount was turned off. Nikon D800 DSLR with a Nikon 300mm f/4.5 lens and a Nikon TC-301 2x teleconverter for effective 600mm f/9.

1B530DE1-D883-4624-9722-8726D6A586B1.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DennisN, collinsmark and Keith_McClary
  • #1,437
Ok, thank you I understand.
Lot of succes :thumbup: :smile:
 
  • #1,438
ISS Flyover - Whiskeytown, California, USA - 7:54pm - 8:00pm 10/4/21 - 6 min, 100 iso, f/4, 14mm, full frame sensor, uncropped, eq mount, moonless Bortle 4

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-4506-gif.150765/
 
  • Like
Likes chemisttree, collinsmark, Keith_McClary and 1 other person
  • #1,439
https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-4509-gif.150766/
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes collinsmark, Ibix and DennisN
  • #1,440
4EDCF059-F6EE-4857-AF52-3CAD119A8F16.jpeg


E4C39C8A-9E17-4588-AFC1-B5ADB198CBA8.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Keith_McClary and DennisN
  • #1,441
North America Nebula - RGB + Hydrogen, Sulfur, Oxygen Narrowband Composite

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/dsc_8781-median-2-2_blended-2-final-gif.151007/
DSC_8781-Median-2-2_blended.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DennisN, bruha and collinsmark
  • #1,442
Hello, I attach images of part Pleiades constellation (I think Electra, Celaehe, Taygeta, Maya) as captured saturday night by eyepiece CCD camera (software SharpCam captures).
Have lot of succes :smile: :thumbup:
 

Attachments

  • Capture_00035.jpg
    Capture_00035.jpg
    3.5 KB · Views: 117
  • Capture_00037.jpg
    Capture_00037.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 126
  • Capture_00038.jpg
    Capture_00038.jpg
    3.4 KB · Views: 130
  • Capture_00039.jpg
    Capture_00039.jpg
    2.8 KB · Views: 110
  • Capture_00040.jpg
    Capture_00040.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 108
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,443
I saw a moon, I fetched my gear. It was very low on the horizon, so I had to walk around in the city a while to be able get a shot of it above the houses.

Here I experimented with ISO and shutter speed to try to get some clouds and moonlight in the same shot too. This obviously results in an overexposed Moon.

(Camera settings: f/8, ISO 1600, Shutter speed: 1/4 s)
51588487011_edee16671f_c.jpg


Moon details:
(Camera settings: f/8, ISO 1600, Shutter speed: 1/1000 s, Stack: 10/40 photos)
51589381990_fc00da3671_c.jpg


I also tried my 400 mm tele lens on Jupiter for fun. After quite a bit of brightness edits in Photoshop,
three of the large four moons appeared as very small dots in the photo.

(From left to right: Jupiter, Io, Europa, Ganymede)
(Camera settings: f/8, ISO 2000, Shutter speed: 1/250 s, Stack: 12/50 photos)
51588701123_4a48c73121_m.jpg


(Gear used for all photos: Sony A6000 and Tokina 400 mm tele lens)
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Devin-M
  • #1,444
The Bubble Nebula (NGC 7635).
Total integration time: 33.82 hours (Hubble palette [SHO narrowband])
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8) skies.

FinalCrop_smaller2048x1474.jpg


NGC 7635, also known as the Bubble Nebula, is an emission nebula in the constellation Cassiopeia. The bubble is formed by the stellar wind from a young, massive, hot star radiating into a nearby molecular cloud. The hot, fast moving stellar wind clumps into the cold, interstellar gas in front of it, forming the edge of the bubble much like how a plow piles up material in front of it as it moves forward. The excited atoms in the heated gas then emit light. The nebula is 7 light-years across and resides 7,100 light-years from Earth. The nebula was discovered by William Herschel in 1787, a prolific scientist who made all sorts of discoveries including the planet Uranus and infrared light.

According to myth and legend, Cassiopeia, sometimes called the "Vain Queen," is revealed to having laid hundreds, maybe thousands, of NGC 7635-shaped "eggs" in and around the far-away, fabled Hadley's Hope colony, in the mythical land of "LV-426." Some know the queen for making a regrettable boast touting that she and her daughter Andromeda were more beautiful than all the Nereids, thus angering the god Poseidon. But she is perhaps best known for getting blown out of an airlock of the orbiting vessel Sulaco during her epic battle with Lieutenant First Class Ellen Ripley, who was driving/wearing a loader at the time (Ripley had a Class II rating). After being ejected into the empty void of space, the queen was immortalized as the constellation Cassiopeia, for all generations henceforth to see and admire.

If science tells us anything, it's that The Bubble Nebula (NGC 7635) is almost certainly not about to hatch, releasing a stellar sized facehugger into the galaxy. Decades, if not centuries of astronomy and astrophysics tell us quite clearly that spawning galactic xenomorphs is not how emission nebulae probably work.

Acquisition and processing details:

SII: 939 x 40sec = 10.43 hours
Hα: 1170 x 40sec = 13 hours
Oiii: 935 x 40sec = 10.39 hours
Total: 33.82 hours

(40 second subs are arguably too short for narrowband at ~f/11, even for Bortle class 7 skies. But when I started the project I decided that until I get the tracking/guiding errors under control, I could accept the increased read noise by having a smaller percentage of subs thrown out. For the next project I anticipate longer subs.)

(Regarding the mount and its tracking issues: There was a moment where I wanted to take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. That said, I admire its purity. A survivor, unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality. I can't lie to you about your chances, but you have my sympathies.)

Equipment:
Telescope: Meade 10" LX200-ACF on equatorial wedge
Camera: ZWO ASI1600MM
QHY off-axis guider
Astronomik narrowband filters (SII, Hα, Oiii)

Software:
Nighttime Imaging 'n Astronomy (N.I.N.A.)
PixInsight (Ripley version)
Topaz Labs Denoise AI

I'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night.
Mostly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Andy Resnick, DennisN, Devin-M and 2 others
  • #1,445
collinsmark said:
The Bubble Nebula (NGC 7635).
Total integration time: 33.82 hours (Hubble palette [SHO narrowband])
Gorgeous!
collinsmark said:
I'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night.
Mostly.
:biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,446
collinsmark said:
NGC 7635, also known as the Bubble Nebula

Stunning results! well worth a poster print!

collinsmark said:
SII: 939 x 40sec = 10.43 hours
Hα: 1170 x 40sec = 13 hours
Oiii: 935 x 40sec = 10.39 hours
Total: 33.82 hours
Yikes… that’s why I’ve recently commissioned the “Goldman Array…” 3 Nikon D800’s with 300mm f/4.5 lenses and 2x teleconverters… so I can capture through all 3 narrowband filters concurrently…

40315B1F-1ED3-47D4-BD63-528781AC754D.jpeg

1243F93B-3F22-4C65-80D5-03A0F25B0185.jpeg


5C641AA4-59A0-4675-A255-485B5522DFA6.jpeg

2623F79A-40D5-454A-AF56-DA1B1A7DC448.jpeg

A82622B9-74D8-4AB0-8B1B-E07FF3DB3178.jpeg


RGB (48x 60s 3200iso 600mm f/9):
3CA5A8ED-2FE4-41E8-863B-5B62AD28E8EB.jpeg

Ha (18x 600s 6400iso):
BC529B78-2177-469C-BE55-D26B1423F19F.jpeg

OIII (26x 600s 6400iso):
D2F4E1DA-488A-4D10-B88F-698F0A430523.jpeg

SII (10x 1200s 6400iso):
CDE443D0-BB93-48E4-9CE2-885D6837FFD1.jpeg

North America & Pelican Nebulas - RGB-SHO Composite (12hrs data in 7hrs in one night):
A76ACAA4-2790-4BEE-B4AE-FC778E0843D2.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,447
Devin-M said:
that’s why I’ve recently commissioned the “Goldman Array…” 3 Nikon D800’s with 300mm f/4.5 lenses and 2x teleconverters… so I can capture through all 3 narrowband filters concurrently…
Impressive and ambitious! :smile:
I can't make out from your pictures of the gear if the three trackers are connected together.
Do the trackers run independently or are they synchronized, I wonder?
 
Last edited:
  • #1,448
DennisN said:
Impressive and ambitious! :smile:
I can't make out from your pictures of the gear if the three trackers are connected together.
Do the trackers run independently or are they synchronized, I wonder?
They aren’t “synchronised” unless you mean they all rotate at the same speed… Each is a standalone tracker. I did have to connect 2 of them to the same usb battery since one of the batteries wasn’t working properly. Since they are on the cheap end of trackers (Star Adventurer 2i Pro - ~$425) I have to point each of them manually. This is made more difficult by the fact that the narrowband filters make both the viewfinder and live preview totally dark and impossible to use. So the only way that I can reliably aim is by trial and error with online plate solving. First I roughly aim and then take a test shot. Then I transfer that test shot to my phone. Then I upload that test shot to http://nova.astrometry.net/upload for plate solving. This tells me where I am actually aiming so I can then adjust and repeat until I’ve achieved acceptable aiming. I wrote a bit more about my first run in a different thread…

Devin-M said:
I think tonight went well. I got RGB as well as narrowband Hydrogen, Oxygen and Sulfur data of an emission nebula at 600mm f/9 with 3 cameras running concurrently in a single session. I was on site at about 7:45pm had all 3 narrowband cameras up and running by around 11:30p and let them run until 3am, so that’s over 9 hours of narrowband data in just over 3 hours. I set up one camera with no narrowband filter first to capture rgb, and once this was up and running I got the 2 other cameras capturing narrowband. Once those two were up and running I reconfigured the RGB camera for Hydrogen Alpha and as I mentioned from 11:30p til 3am all 3 cameras were capturing narrowband. I left the cameras running dark frames on the way home and will continue to let the cameras capture more dark frames while I sleep. The settings I chose were pretty extreme on the narrowband… 10 minutes per exposure at 6400iso for the hydrogen and oxygen filters and a full 20 minutes of open shutter per exposure on the sulphur filter. Haven’t had a chance to look at the data but I do know they were in pretty decent focus as I used a bahtinov mask to focus every camera, and again after switching from RGB to Ha. The most troublesome thing that happened was I had very slow internet on my phone for plate solving to confirm aim. Also one of my USB batteries powering the mounts kept shutting off so I ended up running 2 mounts off a single USB battery pack (fortunately it had 2 output ports). Also next time I’ll remember to switch camera batteries when switching from RGB to Ha as I think the Ha session may have ended a little early from the camera battery running out of juice at some point. All in all I deem the mission a success (having not yet seen the actual data). Will begin processing data tomorrow…
E1AB270C-B44E-471E-A717-19C25996CC34.png


E7089420-6B8F-426B-B57C-6F3D672985B1.png


C4F994AD-1AAA-43F7-A110-8846FC3CA054.png


769F4D51-94CE-43DF-8D2E-A828053CCA0D.jpeg


9E3965DE-D08E-4ABE-89BE-8071C39918D4.jpeg


0A160D7D-91DF-4542-B40A-64A579D6791D.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, collinsmark and Keith_McClary
  • #1,449
Hello, it is from before yesterday-for moons visible.. o_O :smile:
lot of succes
 

Attachments

  • Capture_00044.jpg
    Capture_00044.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 106
  • Like
Likes Andy Resnick, Devin-M, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #1,450
It's going to be cloudy for the next week (or so) here, so this may be all I can get of Andromdea (M31) this year:

800mm_Andromeda-mod-St-60089s_1-1.jpg


Deets: 800/8 lens, D810 sensor, 16.6 hours total integration time (10s subs) @ ISO 125. RAWs stacked in Astro Pixel Processor. For me, this object is a little tricky to image because it barely fits within the frame. Stopping down the lens from f/5.6 dramatically reduced both chromatic and monochromatic aberrations, resulting in good acutance and well-controlled color across the sensor (for a change). I'm somewhat confused by what appear to be open clusters around the periphery (1:1 crops):

800mm_Andromeda-mod-St-60089s.tiff (RGB)-2.jpg

800mm_Andromeda-mod-St-60089s.tiff (RGB)-4.jpg


It's as though the clusters are within M31 instead of the Milky Way, but that can't be right since I can resolve individual stars within the clusters. Any guesses?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes collinsmark, Devin-M and DennisN

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top