OUT Hyperbolic Motions | 65 Characters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Altabeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hyperbolic
Altabeh
Messages
657
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody

I've been lately a little bit concerned over the hyperbolic motions that have the following equations in (ct,x)-space:

\frac{x^2}{(c^2/a)^2}-\frac{(ct)^2}{(c^2/a)^2}=1.

We know that events horizons are the lines that form a 45-degree angle by both ct- and x-axis. So what does actually assure us that here, for instance, for t=0, x=\pm c^2/a lie inside events horizens? Is this just because a can't in magnitude gets higher than c?

AB
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Altabeh said:
Hi everybody

I've been lately a little bit concerned over the hyperbolic motions that have the following equations in (ct,x)-space:

\frac{x^2}{(c^2/a)^2}-\frac{(ct)^2}{(c^2/a)^2}=1.

We know that events horizons are the lines that form a 45-degree angle by both ct- and x-axis. So what does actually assure us that here, for instance, for t=0, x=\pm c^2/a lie inside events horizens? Is this just because a can't in magnitude gets higher than c?

AB

No.

x^2 - \left(ct\right)^2 = \left( \frac{c^2}{a} \right)^2,

so a \rightarrow \infty gives the horizons. For t=0, any value of x except x = 0 lies inside the horizons.
 
George Jones said:
No.

x^2 - \left(ct\right)^2 = \left( \frac{c^2}{a} \right)^2,

so a \rightarrow \infty gives the horizons. For t=0, any value of x except x = 0 lies inside the horizons.

Yeah, I got it!

Thanks
 
Also, differentiating

x^2 - \left(ct\right)^2 = \left( \frac{c^2}{a} \right)^2,

gives

\frac{dx}{dt} = c \frac{ct}{x}.[/itex]<br /> <br /> Consequently,<br /> <br /> -c &amp;lt; \frac{dx}{dt} &amp;lt; c<br /> <br /> gives that \left(ct , x \right) lies inside the horizons.
 
George Jones said:
Consequently,

-c &lt; \frac{dx}{dt} &lt; c

gives that \left(ct , x \right) lies inside the horizons.

Could you explain this a little bit more?
 
Altabeh said:
Could you explain this a little bit more?
Combine the following and what do you get?
George Jones said:
\frac{dx}{dt} = c \frac{ct}{x}.
-c &lt; \frac{dx}{dt} &lt; c
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top